|
Post by kjs on Apr 22, 2019 14:29:40 GMT -6
The Book of Daniel was written in two languages Hebrew and Aramaic. Chapter 1 and then Chapter 8 through 12 were written in Hebrew -- while chapter's two through 7 were written in Aramaic.
In fact the different languages is why many scholars claim that the Book of Daniel was not written by the one known as Daniel.
Since in Matthew 24:15 -- Jesus says "15 When, therefore, you see the abomination of desolation, which was spoken of through Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place (let the reader understand),..."
Tell's us that Daniel was a Real Prophet -- who was authenticated by Jesus. It ALSO tells us that -- The Maccabean Revolt [167 to 160 BCE] -- which was fought because of the following offense ..."In 168 BC, the Greek king Antiochus IV Epiphanes invaded Jerusalem and captured the city. He marched into the Jewish temple, erected a statue of the Greek god Zeus, and sacrificed a pig on the altar of incense." WAS NOT the abomination of desolation (spoken of in Daniel) because by the time of Jesus it was already 200 years in the past.
So from the time of Jesus -- until NOW (present day) abomination of desolation -- HAS NOT OCCURRED! (all those who speak of the 70th year already occurring -- needs to SHOW where the abomination of desolation has occurred AND -- Since during The Olivet Discourse given by Jesus points to the LAST DAYS -- why if it (abomination of desolation) has happen -- why has Jesus not returned?
jamie -- I believe you are a bit confused when you claim - "the only prince mentioned in the text is Messiah"....
Let us try reading it again "25 Know therefore and discern, that from the going out of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem to the Anointed One, the prince, shall be seven weeks, and sixty-two weeks: it shall be built again, with street and moat, even in troubled times. "
So we have Prince number One mentioned specifically as "the Anointed One, the prince" -- So this is definitely the Messiah.
NEXT - "26 After the sixty-two weeks the Anointed One shall be cut off, and shall have nothing..." This is Still Prince Number One -- AND HE DIES!!!!! AND HAS NOTHING -- no land, no people ....
NOW verse 26 continues ... the people of the prince who shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; -- NOTICE IT SAYS THE PEOPLE -- OF THE COMING PRINCE -- this is talking about PRINCE TWO!
THERE ARE NOW TWO PRINCES being discussed ... one is dead and One is coming with a group of people who will destroy the CITY and the temple.....
Verse 27 finishes the chapter with ... "27 He shall make a firm covenant with many for one week: and in the middle of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the offering to cease; and on the wing of abominations shall come one who makes desolate; and even to the full end, and that determined, shall wrath be poured out on the desolate."
WHO is the HE? -- THE ONLY PRINCE STILL LIVING!
Remember at the time of this prophecy ... there is NO Resurrection being discussed.... You have a dead Prince and A Prince who comes with his people and destroys the city and temple....
I want to expand on something you said, When Christ died he was as Prince. Christ was heir to the King. But when Christ comes back, he is King and he will reign. This would imply that the prince spoken of is not Christ but another prince IMO. NOW -- You are confusing me ... your taking a Parable and applying it to Jesus Christ....
So taking it step by step .... When Christ died he was as Prince. --- YEP ... Verse 25 says "the Anointed One, the prince" verse 26 says the Anointed One shall be cut off, (same person so same title)
NEXT you say "Christ was heir to the King" -- Yes, and male heir to King is a Prince.....
The parable you shared -- is the heir (Prince) being slain -- and having nothing.....
The Parable ends with Jesus making a point to the Pharisees .... (and that point was not about the resurrection)
Yes, when Jesus returns at the second coming HE WILL BE CROWNED King of Kings and sit upon David's throne ...
So is your claim that Jesus (Prince of Peace) is already crowned and therefore is a King and no longer a Prince....so therefore was never a prince?
Having trouble following that -- Yes, Jesus will be King -- but as far as I can tell -- He is not King yet -- it is a future event.
JUST FYI Rev 11 is prophecy of future as it says "are become the kingdoms of our Lord"
this is future continuous tense or future progressive tense -- so something (this case the kingdoms) -- will be in the future and will be completed....
|
|
|
Post by kjs on Apr 22, 2019 16:31:37 GMT -6
The Book of Daniel was written in two languages Hebrew and Aramaic. Chapter 1 and then Chapter 8 through 12 were written in Hebrew -- while chapter's two through 7 were written in Aramaic.
In fact the different languages is why many scholars claim that the Book of Daniel was not written by the one known as Daniel.
Since in Matthew 24:15 -- Jesus says "15 When, therefore, you see the abomination of desolation, which was spoken of through Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place (let the reader understand),..."
Tell's us that Daniel was a Real Prophet -- who was authenticated by Jesus. It ALSO tells us that -- The Maccabean Revolt [167 to 160 BCE] -- which was fought because of the following offense ..."In 168 BC, the Greek king Antiochus IV Epiphanes invaded Jerusalem and captured the city. He marched into the Jewish temple, erected a statue of the Greek god Zeus, and sacrificed a pig on the altar of incense." WAS NOT the abomination of desolation (spoken of in Daniel) because by the time of Jesus it was already 200 years in the past.
So from the time of Jesus -- until NOW (present day) abomination of desolation -- HAS NOT OCCURRED! (all those who speak of the 70th year already occurring -- needs to SHOW where the abomination of desolation has occurred AND -- Since during The Olivet Discourse given by Jesus points to the LAST DAYS -- why if it (abomination of desolation) has happen -- why has Jesus not returned?
jamie -- I believe you are a bit confused when you claim - "the only prince mentioned in the text is Messiah"....
Let us try reading it again "25 Know therefore and discern, that from the going out of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem to the Anointed One, the prince, shall be seven weeks, and sixty-two weeks: it shall be built again, with street and moat, even in troubled times. "
So we have Prince number One mentioned specifically as "the Anointed One, the prince" -- So this is definitely the Messiah.
NEXT - "26 After the sixty-two weeks the Anointed One shall be cut off, and shall have nothing..." This is Still Prince Number One -- AND HE DIES!!!!! AND HAS NOTHING -- no land, no people ....
NOW verse 26 continues ... the people of the prince who shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; -- NOTICE IT SAYS THE PEOPLE -- OF THE COMING PRINCE -- this is talking about PRINCE TWO!
THERE ARE NOW TWO PRINCES being discussed ... one is dead and One is coming with a group of people who will destroy the CITY and the temple.....
Verse 27 finishes the chapter with ... "27 He shall make a firm covenant with many for one week: and in the middle of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the offering to cease; and on the wing of abominations shall come one who makes desolate; and even to the full end, and that determined, shall wrath be poured out on the desolate."
WHO is the HE? -- THE ONLY PRINCE STILL LIVING!
Remember at the time of this prophecy ... there is NO Resurrection being discussed.... You have a dead Prince and A Prince who comes with his people and destroys the city and temple....
It's talking about the same prince. That happens all the time in most languages. The entire tense of verse 26 is future. SHALL BE is future, and so is the rest of the passage. The text is talking about AFTER threescore and two weeks - the Messiah is cut off. This 'after the fact' terminology is common place in nearly every language. I think you're going out of the boundaries of grammar and comprehension to prove your point.
"And AFTER threescore and two weeks SHALL Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that SHALL come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined."
We do this often in everyday speech. It doesn't mean we are talking about two different people or things. Just about two different aspects of the same thing, both being future.
SO the DEAD Prince -- is leading a several hundred of HIS People -- to destroy HIS own CITY and Temple?
Think you should re-read the entire verse ....
THEY ARE DIFFERENT!
AND to top it off ... Verse 26 has already been fulfilled -- and we already KNOW WHAT HAPPEN.....
The Messiah Dies (and was resurrected) and leaves earth .....
The Prince who was to Come -- Was a Roman Leader -- whose daddy just happen to become emperor (sounds like Son is a Prince to anyone else?)
This Prince (and His Army) destroyed the city (Jerusalem) and the Temple.....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 22, 2019 18:47:46 GMT -6
Hey Venge, I have had a chance to look at the Hebrew of Daniel 9 and 12 with this transliteration tool......bu I am no Hebrew expert! I have in the past sought help from Jewish believers in Israel to arrive at some of my conclusions: www.qbible.com/hebrew-old-testament/daniel/12.htmlThe Hebrew of Daniel 9:27 and Daniel 12:11 use the same words for what is translated as the "abominations he shall make desolate", and the "abomination that makes desolate". In both instances this is associated with the cessation of the daily....the Hebrew in each case is "Shiqutz shomem" to describe the abomination of desolation, so I believe Daniel 9 and 12 both refer to the AoD as the same event. The sentence structure of Daniel 12:11 suggests the cessation of sacrifice and AoD occur at the same time, and then 1290 days follow....and the sentence structure of Daniel 9:27 suggests the middle of the shabua, or week as the point at which these events occur. After studying the Hebrew, I am comfortable with the idea that the cessation of the daily and the AoD occur in the middle of the 70th week, and the latter half of the 70th week is 1290 days, at which point things are pretty well wrapped up. The English translations will often insert prepositions or words not present in the Hebrew, and I find it useful to explore the various possibilities of the Hebrew root words, and to look at the words exactly in order by the Hebrew. Shalom!
|
|
|
Post by venge on Apr 23, 2019 7:08:03 GMT -6
I want to expand on something you said, When Christ died he was as Prince. Christ was heir to the King. But when Christ comes back, he is King and he will reign. This would imply that the prince spoken of is not Christ but another prince IMO. NOW -- You are confusing me ... your taking a Parable and applying it to Jesus Christ....
So taking it step by step .... When Christ died he was as Prince. --- YEP ... Verse 25 says "the Anointed One, the prince" verse 26 says the Anointed One shall be cut off, (same person so same title)
NEXT you say "Christ was heir to the King" -- Yes, and male heir to King is a Prince.....
The parable you shared -- is the heir (Prince) being slain -- and having nothing.....
The Parable ends with Jesus making a point to the Pharisees .... (and that point was not about the resurrection)
Yes, when Jesus returns at the second coming HE WILL BE CROWNED King of Kings and sit upon David's throne ...
So is your claim that Jesus (Prince of Peace) is already crowned and therefore is a King and no longer a Prince....so therefore was never a prince?
Having trouble following that -- Yes, Jesus will be King -- but as far as I can tell -- He is not King yet -- it is a future event.
JUST FYI Rev 11 is prophecy of future as it says "are become the kingdoms of our Lord"
this is future continuous tense or future progressive tense -- so something (this case the kingdoms) -- will be in the future and will be completed....
Haha, didn't mean to confuse you. Of course I realize Christ was making a parable to the Pharisees. I was just relating how he was still a Prince and when he returns it is as King. He doesn't return a Prince and how I see the statement is that a different Prince comes along. Not because of the scripture I laid out specifically, but how I interpret it. I only laid out that scripture to highlight it appears odd to think a Prince dies but then the Prince comes again and his own people destroy the city and the sanctuary? He is co ruler with the Father. I imagine it like other Kings in ancient times. As the son got older, the son would sit with the King and would learn. Till such time that the son would be crowned King and would inherit the kingdom.
|
|
|
Post by venge on Apr 23, 2019 7:11:39 GMT -6
Hey Venge, I have had a chance to look at the Hebrew of Daniel 9 and 12 with this transliteration tool......bu I am no Hebrew expert! I have in the past sought help from Jewish believers in Israel to arrive at some of my conclusions: www.qbible.com/hebrew-old-testament/daniel/12.htmlThe Hebrew of Daniel 9:27 and Daniel 12:11 use the same words for what is translated as the "abominations he shall make desolate", and the "abomination that makes desolate". In both instances this is associated with the cessation of the daily....the Hebrew in each case is "Shiqutz shomem" to describe the abomination of desolation, so I believe Daniel 9 and 12 both refer to the AoD as the same event. The sentence structure of Daniel 12:11 suggests the cessation of sacrifice and AoD occur at the same time, and then 1290 days follow....and the sentence structure of Daniel 9:27 suggests the middle of the shabua, or week as the point at which these events occur. After studying the Hebrew, I am comfortable with the idea that the cessation of the daily and the AoD occur in the middle of the 70th week, and the latter half of the 70th week is 1290 days, at which point things are pretty well wrapped up. The English translations will often insert prepositions or words not present in the Hebrew, and I find it useful to explore the various possibilities of the Hebrew root words, and to look at the words exactly in order by the Hebrew. Shalom! interesting, I will go back thru it and review. cant atm have to mulch today lol EDIT: Finished mulching for today, still not done but my back is sore lol. I had a chance to look back at the Koine Greek and match it up. Both the same words are used in Dan 9:27 and 12:11 with small differences to the words themselves but not enough to deter the idea. With that in mind, if you are correct, I find it difficult to think if Jerusalem is taken early with 42 mo's. How do the 2 witnesses survive in the open when others don't. I appreciate the comment and now I need to go research a little more. Still would like to understand the 2 1260 days in Rev 12 and how they apply.
|
|
|
Post by mike on Apr 23, 2019 14:01:48 GMT -6
venge - after reading the post it'd be hilarious if you Avatar was changed based on the mulch and feeling of back pain.
|
|
|
Post by venge on Apr 23, 2019 14:13:12 GMT -6
venge - after reading the post it'd be hilarious if you Avatar was changed based on the mulch and feeling of back pain. sigh already did, Im sad, hurt and I got sun burn. I forgot my SPF 5,000
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 23, 2019 19:07:23 GMT -6
Venge, sounds like you didnt have mulch fun today, ha ha!
I believe the 1st 6 verses of Rev 12 pertain to the Great signs in Heaven......then, the rest of the chapter is telling a story, shedding more light on the events from a different vantage point....and so I believe the two different 1260 events are one and the same...the first half of the 70th week, future from John's perspective.....he is using a typical Jewish method to tell the story, multiple vignettes to get the point across, like Jesus did with some of His parables.....ie "the kingdom of God is like", followed by multiple vignettes.
I could relate a play by play of a football game, then relate how the band played and affected the game, and then how the crowd got into it....all leading to the same result..this is how I see the construction of Rev 12.
First the description of the Great signs in heaven...which in effect is a time marker, using an ancient language (lights given for signs, seasons, days, years), that men have used for thousands of years, and transcend time and culture.....I don't speak ancient Greek, but John is effectively using a primitive language that transcends time. As Yardstick once said, it is a calendar of sorts.
Then, a description of events which we see played out on earth.......resulting in Satan on earth amplifying the persecution and hatred of Jews and Christians....it is notable that these have especially amplified since 2017. Anti-semitism and anti-Christian hatred are illogical, and unexplainable unless we understand our battle is not against flesh and blood, but against the unseen spiritual forces of darkness described by Paul, and alluded to in Daniel......these forces influence those whose house in uninhabited, ie unbelievers, who have become unwitting zombies of Satan to effect the persecution referred to in Rev 12.
But, we know greater is He that is in us, than He that is in the World, so we take courage, and are not susceptible to the Dragon thrown to earth! Shalom
|
|
|
Post by venge on Apr 24, 2019 7:57:51 GMT -6
Venge, sounds like you didnt have mulch fun today, ha ha! I believe the 1st 6 verses of Rev 12 pertain to the Great signs in Heaven......then, the rest of the chapter is telling a story, shedding more light on the events from a different vantage point....and so I believe the two different 1260 events are one and the same...the first half of the 70th week, future from John's perspective.....he is using a typical Jewish method to tell the story, multiple vignettes to get the point across, like Jesus did with some of His parables.....ie "the kingdom of God is like", followed by multiple vignettes. I could relate a play by play of a football game, then relate how the band played and affected the game, and then how the crowd got into it....all leading to the same result..this is how I see the construction of Rev 12. First the description of the Great signs in heaven...which in effect is a time marker, using an ancient language (lights given for signs, seasons, days, years), that men have used for thousands of years, and transcend time and culture.....I don't speak ancient Greek, but John is effectively using a primitive language that transcends time. As Yardstick once said, it is a calendar of sorts. Then, a description of events which we see played out on earth.......resulting in Satan on earth amplifying the persecution and hatred of Jews and Christians....it is notable that these have especially amplified since 2017. Anti-semitism and anti-Christian hatred are illogical, and unexplainable unless we understand our battle is not against flesh and blood, but against the unseen spiritual forces of darkness described by Paul, and alluded to in Daniel......these forces influence those whose house in uninhabited, ie unbelievers, who have become unwitting zombies of Satan to effect the persecution referred to in Rev 12. But, we know greater is He that is in us, than He that is in the World, so we take courage, and are not susceptible to the Dragon thrown to earth! Shalom And that is were I don’t see what you see. As I see the first 6 verses referenced to Joseph’s dream where his brothers, father and mother make obeisance to him. The 12 stars in heaven being the princes of the 12 tribes. Princes and kings are many times referred to as stars in heaven. This is documented in Genesis. I’m at work so I can’t pull the exact chapter, verse atm. This story flows right into the other verses. I cannot see the verses telling us to physically look into outer space. Rather, to understand the beginning of what God wanted for his people beginning at the 12 tribes to Christ to the apostles to us.
|
|
|
Post by venge on Apr 24, 2019 8:10:05 GMT -6
Why are the 1260 days are mentioned twice? I don't know. Rev. 12 is a chapter I've not spent much time on. I can’t see them as the same. One is when Christ goes up. The other is after a war in heaven. It would not make sense to mention it twice the way it’s written because it’s written in a way that suggests 2 events separate from each other. This is why I’m wondering if the 2nd time it’s mentioned is relation to Revelation itself during the 42 months. If so, the week could be halved. It’s important because I take a literal week stance but I also understand that part of it could have been done after the 69th week when Christ walked till he died “after 69 weeks”.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 24, 2019 10:36:19 GMT -6
Venge, I hope your back doesn't hurt too mulch today....
I understand where you are coming from....let me ask you this if I may....in Luke we have reference to great signs in heaven, and signs in sun, moon, and stars. I am particularly interested in the great signs in heaven Jesus answers to the disciples after they asked Him what the signs of His coming would be. What is your opinion of what Jesus is referring to here?:
10 Then He continued by saying to them, “Nation will rise against nation and kingdom against kingdom, 11 and there will be great earthquakes, and in various places plagues and famines; and there will be terrors and great signs from heaven.
Since John uses the phrase "great sign in heaven" on 3 occasions in Revelation, do you think it is possible John is referring to the great signs in heaven Jesus is referring to?
|
|
|
Post by Natalie on Apr 24, 2019 10:46:18 GMT -6
One problem that some people have with seeing Rev 12 as being a real sign in the heavens is because the constellations and their purposes have been so corrupted over time by Satan's Zodiak. It's the confusion of astronomy vs astrology. But the Bible clearly teaches that God created the stars, put them in their place, named them, and people knew their names (for example Orion and Pleiades in the book of Job). We can study astronomy and stay very far away from astrology even when we talk of constellations and the moving about of heavenly bodies.
And I think Joseph's dream can help us understand the narrative in Rev 12, but it clearly says that there was a sign in the sun, moon, and stars. God was showing John something.
|
|
|
Post by mike on Apr 24, 2019 11:13:40 GMT -6
have not studied this at all but wanted to interject that the account of Josephs dream, though similar to Johns vision was not identical. Josephs dream was involving his 11 brothers bowing to the twelfth, a picture or foreshadow of him being a type of Christ. While Johns vision involves all 12, not picturing anyone bowing to another
|
|
|
Post by yardstick on Apr 24, 2019 11:22:54 GMT -6
Hey Venge, I have had a chance to look at the Hebrew of Daniel 9 and 12 with this transliteration tool......bu I am no Hebrew expert! I have in the past sought help from Jewish believers in Israel to arrive at some of my conclusions: www.qbible.com/hebrew-old-testament/daniel/12.htmlThe Hebrew of Daniel 9:27 and Daniel 12:11 use the same words for what is translated as the "abominations he shall make desolate", and the "abomination that makes desolate". In both instances this is associated with the cessation of the daily....the Hebrew in each case is "Shiqutz shomem" to describe the abomination of desolation, so I believe Daniel 9 and 12 both refer to the AoD as the same event. The sentence structure of Daniel 12:11 suggests the cessation of sacrifice and AoD occur at the same time, and then 1290 days follow....and the sentence structure of Daniel 9:27 suggests the middle of the shabua, or week as the point at which these events occur. After studying the Hebrew, I am comfortable with the idea that the cessation of the daily and the AoD occur in the middle of the 70th week, and the latter half of the 70th week is 1290 days, at which point things are pretty well wrapped up. The English translations will often insert prepositions or words not present in the Hebrew, and I find it useful to explore the various possibilities of the Hebrew root words, and to look at the words exactly in order by the Hebrew. Shalom! interesting, I will go back thru it and review. cant atm have to mulch today lol EDIT: Finished mulching for today, still not done but my back is sore lol. I had a chance to look back at the Koine Greek and match it up. Both the same words are used in Dan 9:27 and 12:11 with small differences to the words themselves but not enough to deter the idea. With that in mind, if you are correct, I find it difficult to think if Jerusalem is taken early with 42 mo's. How do the 2 witnesses survive in the open when others don't. I appreciate the comment and now I need to go research a little more. Still would like to understand the 2 1260 days in Rev 12 and how they apply. Venge, This is a great question, and I think is often overlooked. I believe, based upon Revelation 11:3-7 that the two witnesses are 'untouchable' until they have completed their witness. Notice that God himself empowers them (v3). Logically, it follows that God will not allow them to be harmed until verse 7. Thus, I also believe the AC murders them himself. Since he at that time will be possessed by satan, he alone will have the power to approach them for purposes of doing harm. See verse 7: "...the beast that comes up from the Abyss will attack them, and overpower and kill them..." Everyone else who approaches them to do harm is killed by them. See v5. Lastly, notice what they are permitted to do: "They have power to shut up the heavens so that it will not rain during the time they are prophesying; and they have power to turn the waters into blood and to strike the earth with every kind of plague as often as they want." This sure sounds an awful lot like the trumpet and bowl judgments doesn't it?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 24, 2019 11:48:39 GMT -6
Yes, it is a good question! In Daniel 9:27, the Hebrew verb is a "hiphil", which does not have an English counterpart, and is used nowhere else in the Bible, "v'higbir". This is a 3rd person causative verb, and according to Emmanuel Tov of Dead Sea Scroll fame, by personal communication, means "he will cause covenant to be strengthened", or "he will cause to strengthen covenant"....I could mow my yard, or I could cause it to be mowed by asking my son to do it.
Causing covenant to be strengthened is not a one time event, but lasts for "echad one", the entire week of 7 years. This implies the division of the Land is supported until the end of the 7 years, in which case it means that Jerusalem is not necessarily taken at the 42 month mark. Israel is relatively protected for the first 42 months, then the Great Tribulation sets in. I don't believe Jerusalem is taken....per Zechariah 12, but it comes under attack.
Hence, the 2 witnesses can be active in Jerusalem during the Great Tribulation which begins after the 42 months.....just a thought! Shalom
|
|