|
Post by boraddict on Dec 9, 2018 20:13:14 GMT -6
That's more or less how I see it happening, too. But that's not what Bora says. Hi Natalie. The cleansing of the earth during our time is like to the cleansing of the earth during Noah's time. It was then that Noah and his family was taken in the ark upon the waters killing all mankind. Similarly, in our time the people are taken in a rapture and the planet burned killing all mankind. Again, Noah and his family repopulated the earth, and likewise, those on the rapture will repopulate the earth in our time.
|
|
|
Post by Natalie on Dec 9, 2018 20:58:38 GMT -6
But those taken in the rapture are changed. We will not be married, will not produce more children. For example, Philippians 3:20-21 "...we await a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ, who will transform our lowly body to be like His glorious body." See also 1 Cor 15:51-53 The perishable will be changed to be imperishable. We will be living in the New Jerusalem. John 14:1-4 In Our Father's house. We will not be the ones to repopulate the earth. There are not two raptures in Rev 12. The "second rapture" that you see is God hiding the believing remnant of the Jews on earth in the wilderness (probably the area of ancient Edom in present day Jordan). Then the Anti-Christ empowered by Satan (the dragon) goes off to kill the Christians (we call them the Tribulation Saints) Rev 12:17. These Jews are still alive when Jesus returns. They will help populate the earth during the 1000 years. (I can get you Scriptures if you want them) (For the Jews being in Edom see Isaiah 63:1-6, Micah 2:12 Bozrah means "sheep pen", Isaiah 34:6) I would like to make the suggestion that you step back from studying Revelation and study other Scriptures. I know that Revelation holds the most interest to you, but I think studying the rest of Scripture will only enhance your understanding of Revelation. I think you are missing things by focusing on this book alone. Or this list would be a great place for you to start: www.johnsnotes.com/documents/OldTestamentReferencesintheBookofRevelation.pdf
|
|
|
Post by boraddict on Dec 9, 2018 22:32:01 GMT -6
But those taken in the rapture are changed. We will not be married, will not produce more children. For example, Philippians 3:20-21 "...we await a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ, who will transform our lowly body to be like His glorious body." See also 1 Cor 15:51-53 The perishable will be changed to be imperishable. We will be living in the New Jerusalem. John 14:1-4 In Our Father's house. We will not be the ones to repopulate the earth. There are not two raptures in Rev 12. The "second rapture" that you see is God hiding the believing remnant of the Jews on earth in the wilderness (probably the area of ancient Edom in present day Jordan). Then the Anti-Christ empowered by Satan (the dragon) goes off to kill the Christians (we call them the Tribulation Saints) Rev 12:17. These Jews are still alive when Jesus returns. They will help populate the earth during the 1000 years. (I can get you Scriptures if you want them) (For the Jews being in Edom see Isaiah 63:1-6, Micah 2:12 Bozrah means "sheep pen", Isaiah 34:6) I would like to make the suggestion that you step back from studying Revelation and study other Scriptures. I know that Revelation holds the most interest to you, but I think studying the rest of Scripture will only enhance your understanding of Revelation. I think you are missing things by focusing on this book alone. Or this list would be a great place for you to start: www.johnsnotes.com/documents/OldTestamentReferencesintheBookofRevelation.pdfYes I understand your position. However, the evidence shows two raptures in Revelation Chapter 12 at Verses 12:6 and 12:14 as follows: v. 12:6, "And the woman fled into the wilderness, where she hath a place prepared of God, that they should feed her there a thousand two hundred and threescore days. v. 12:14 "And to the woman were given two wings of a great eagle, that she might fly into the wilderness, into her place, where she is nourished for a time, and times, and half a time, from the face of the serpent." I realize that there are multiple theories that explain how these two raptures are one or that one or the other is as you have said. However, the fact is that these two exist in the same chapter and each has a period of time that appears to be 3.5 years. So there are multiple variables as to how this may go together and you have stated one possibility. For instance, I do agree that the second rapture may be for the tribe of Judah at Jerusalem; however, it may not be exclusively Judah who repopulates the earth. As a matter of fact, I do like the idea of the second rapture being exclusively Judah. That makes so much since because Ron Wyatt found the Ark of the Covenant there and in my opinion it will be brought out in defense of Judah at the second rapture or close to it. I suppose it would be beneficial to discover when the Ark of the Covenant was used by Israel (the 12 tribes), and if it was ever used by Judah exclusively; after the 10 tribes were taken by Assyria. I do not think the Ark of the Covenant was ever used by Judah exclusively. Only that Jeremiah hid it as Ron Wyatt explains prior to the fall of Jerusalem to Neb. Thus, Judah did not use the Ark of the Covenant against Babylon; not that I can see anyway. So, I would tend to believe that all 12 tribes must be present when the Ark of the Covenant is used again and not only Judah. There are so many variables that for me to settle on a church doctrine simply will not work. I am convinced that all the information is to be found in the BoR.
|
|
|
Post by cwood85 on Dec 9, 2018 23:46:56 GMT -6
Natalie is making a good point on what she is suggesting. You cannot complete a puzzle with only one piece or have 10 of something and call it a dozen.
I will make a few suggestion with the BoR, one read this verse right here:
“1The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John:
There are a lot of translations that do not include that word signified in them and the KJV actually got it right. Even though it is in the original Greek. It means to SYMBOLIZE.
The book of Revelation is not entirely yet to happen as future because:
”19Write the things which thou hast seen (has already witnessed/seen/happen), and the things which are (currently seeing/witnessing/happening) and the things which shall be hereafter (will witness/see/happen);
suggestion number 2: The word PROPHECY is always always looked at as meaning future events only, but that is not the entire meaning at all. From Strong’s:
-the gift of communicating and enforcing revealed truth.
Not revealed future or future only events, but truth.
As as far as the 2 rapture/resurrection, this seems pretty clear and also who the priest in the thousand reign are:
20:6Blessed and holy is the one who has a part in the FIRST resurrection; over these the second death has no power, but they will be priests of God and of Christ and will reign with Him for a thousand years.
who are the priest during the thousand year Kingdom:
1:5and from Jesus Christ, the faithful witness, the firstborn of the dead, and the ruler of the kings of the earth. To Him who loves us and released us from our sins by His blood— 6and He has made us to be a kingdom, priests to His God and Father—to Him be the glory and the dominion forever and ever. Amen.
The BoR is not about the total annihilation/destruction of mankind, it is about our redemption and victory through Jesus Christ and how that is going to be accomplished.
|
|
|
Post by boraddict on Dec 10, 2018 1:57:52 GMT -6
Natalie is making a good point on what she is suggesting. You cannot complete a puzzle with only one piece or have 10 of something and call it a dozen. I will make a few suggestion with the BoR, one read this verse right here: “1The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John: There are a lot of translations that do not include that word signified in them and the KJV actually got it right. Even though it is in the original Greek. It means to SYMBOLIZE. The book of Revelation is not entirely yet to happen as future because: ”19Write the things which thou hast seen (has already witnessed/seen/happen), and the things which are (currently seeing/witnessing/happening) and the things which shall be hereafter (will witness/see/happen);
suggestion number 2: The word PROPHECY is always always looked at as meaning future events only, but that is not the entire meaning at all. From Strong’s: -the gift of communicating and enforcing revealed truth.Not revealed future or future only events, but truth. As as far as the 2 rapture/resurrection, this seems pretty clear and also who the priest in the thousand reign are: 20:6 Blessed and holy is the one who has a part in the FIRST resurrection; over these the second death has no power, but they will be priests of God and of Christ and will reign with Him for a thousand years. who are the priest during the thousand year Kingdom: 1:5and from Jesus Christ, the faithful witness, the firstborn of the dead, and the ruler of the kings of the earth. To Him who loves us and released us from our sins by His blood— 6and He has made us to be a kingdom, priests to His God and Father—to Him be the glory and the dominion forever and ever. Amen. The BoR is not about the total annihilation/destruction of mankind, it is about our redemption and victory through Jesus Christ and how that is going to be accomplished. Hi CW. You have made several great points. 1) "Signified" to mean symbolize is reasonable because the angel showed John the vision/visions. 2) The expanded meaning of "prophecy" is also reasonable. 3) Verse 20:6 is a great find and I am surprised to see it in the context of the two raptures in Chapter 12 as you have used it. However, this verses seems to state the first resurrection in contrast to the second that is 1,000 years later. That the first resurrection is a resurrection of the dead in which the dead will not die a second death. In contrast, those of the second resurrection have a second death that is the spiritual death of not being with God for ever. Thus, those of the first resurrection are priests of God and of Christ and will reign with him for 1,000 years. That is, those of the first resurrection (not rapture) will live with God forever (no second death) and they are priests of God for the 1,000 year period of time. The priests are of the tribe of Ephraim that is the church; not Judah exclusively. That is, the priests are right here and right now learning and building their testimonies. It is they who will be called on the first rapture to do a work and the first resurrection is a part of that work. However, I do not know where in time the first resurrection takes place. According to Chapter 11, it begins when the two witnesses are called back to their bodies. 4) I think you are showing that the ruler of the kings of the earth is the Savior. Thus, the kings of the earth in the BoR are the priests who live on earth for the 1,000 years. Verse 7:15 shows that they will work in the temple among other things. 5) I agree that the BoR is about redemption and victory through Christ. However, those who will not join that group will be removed from the earth. In conclusion, it appears to me that two raptures exist as evidenced in Chapter 12. Additionally, two resurrections exist. One of these resurrections take place somewhere during the two raptures, and the second resurrection is 1,000 years later. During that 1,000 years, the priests of God that are the kings of the earth work in the temple among other things. These kings of the earth are not the tribe of Judah exclusively but of all 12 tribes which are denoted as Ephraim; the tribe of adoption. That is, all 12 tribes as well as all people of the earth are adopted into the tribe of Ephraim and this is the church. Whereas, the tribe of Judah is the kingship tribe from which kings of the kingdom are derived. Thus, Ephraim is presided over by a king of Judah. Thus, the king of Judah is a priest of Ephraim.
|
|
rondonmonson
Truth Seeker
I can do all things through Christ which strengthens me....
Posts: 186
|
Post by rondonmonson on Dec 10, 2018 2:39:21 GMT -6
But those taken in the rapture are changed. We will not be married, will not produce more children. For example, Philippians 3:20-21 "...we await a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ, who will transform our lowly body to be like His glorious body." See also 1 Cor 15:51-53 The perishable will be changed to be imperishable. We will be living in the New Jerusalem. John 14:1-4 In Our Father's house. We will not be the ones to repopulate the earth. There are not two raptures in Rev 12. The "second rapture" that you see is God hiding the believing remnant of the Jews on earth in the wilderness (probably the area of ancient Edom in present day Jordan). Then the Anti-Christ empowered by Satan (the dragon) goes off to kill the Christians (we call them the Tribulation Saints) Rev 12:17. These Jews are still alive when Jesus returns. They will help populate the earth during the 1000 years. (I can get you Scriptures if you want them) (For the Jews being in Edom see Isaiah 63:1-6, Micah 2:12 Bozrah means "sheep pen", Isaiah 34:6) I would like to make the suggestion that you step back from studying Revelation and study other Scriptures. I know that Revelation holds the most interest to you, but I think studying the rest of Scripture will only enhance your understanding of Revelation. I think you are missing things by focusing on this book alone. Or this list would be a great place for you to start: www.johnsnotes.com/documents/OldTestamentReferencesintheBookofRevelation.pdfVery impressive......and good advice to boot. Out of the 404 verses in Revelation I think 289 have references to the Old Testament. When I heard that years ago, and was told that in order to understand the BoR one had to use the Old Testament as a "CODE BOOK" to interpret it, everything in the BoR opened up to me. The Woman in Rev. 12 is thus seen as Israel (Gen. 37:9) etc. I don't see any Rapture in Rev. 12, I don't buy into the Heavenly sign in HEAVEN theory at all, others do, but I think the scriptures say different, and I have to remain true to scriptures. In Rev. 15 we see an Angel sees another "Sign in Heaven" and it's about the coming Seven Vials being readied. They are being readied in the Temple in Heaven, the one the earthly Temple was patterned after, it's in Heaven, thus its seen as a sign in heaven. The reason Rev. 12 starts out as a sign in heaven is its about Satan who is in Heaven, and then is cast out of Heaven by Michael (SEE Daniel 12:1-2, Michael stands up). The Chapter is about Satan being cast to earth and thus chasing the Woman (Israel) into the Wilderness (Petra, most likely) via the Anti-Christ but God protecting her on "EAGLES WINGS" and God is called eagles wings in the Old Testament, which is why that was good advice, everyone needs to understand that the Old Testament is a code book for the BoR. Exodus 19:4 Ye have seen what I did unto the Egyptians, and how I bare you on eagles' wings, and brought you unto myself. Deuteronomy 32:11 As an eagle stirs up its nest and hovers over its young, He spread His wings to catch them; He carried them on His pinions. God is seen as an Eagles wings many times in the Old Testament, protecting Israel. I see Rev. 12:1-5 as an ENCODED MESSAGE to tell us the players in the Chapter. The Red Dragon is Satan, the Woman is Israel and the Male Child (proper translation is MALE not MAN) that Ascends to Heaven (Jesus). Then the Prophecy starts in verse 6. Israel flees unto the Wilderness at the halfway point of the 70th week or the tribulation period. That is why she needs to hide in the Wilderness (under God's wings) for 1260 days until Jesus' Second Coming. The Rapture has already happened, pre tribulation, IMHO. Thus I see no Rapture here, some say so, but I do not see it. Satan is cast out of Heaven, then after failing to get at he Jews who fled, he goes after the Christian's who repented after the Rapture, thus they become Martyrs. Good link, I bookmarked it, thanks.
|
|
rondonmonson
Truth Seeker
I can do all things through Christ which strengthens me....
Posts: 186
|
Post by rondonmonson on Dec 10, 2018 2:51:24 GMT -6
But those taken in the rapture are changed. We will not be married, will not produce more children. For example, Philippians 3:20-21 "...we await a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ, who will transform our lowly body to be like His glorious body." See also 1 Cor 15:51-53 The perishable will be changed to be imperishable. We will be living in the New Jerusalem. John 14:1-4 In Our Father's house. We will not be the ones to repopulate the earth. There are not two raptures in Rev 12. The "second rapture" that you see is God hiding the believing remnant of the Jews on earth in the wilderness (probably the area of ancient Edom in present day Jordan). Then the Anti-Christ empowered by Satan (the dragon) goes off to kill the Christians (we call them the Tribulation Saints) Rev 12:17. These Jews are still alive when Jesus returns. They will help populate the earth during the 1000 years. (I can get you Scriptures if you want them) (For the Jews being in Edom see Isaiah 63:1-6, Micah 2:12 Bozrah means "sheep pen", Isaiah 34:6) I would like to make the suggestion that you step back from studying Revelation and study other Scriptures. I know that Revelation holds the most interest to you, but I think studying the rest of Scripture will only enhance your understanding of Revelation. I think you are missing things by focusing on this book alone. Or this list would be a great place for you to start: www.johnsnotes.com/documents/OldTestamentReferencesintheBookofRevelation.pdfYes I understand your position. However, the evidence shows two raptures in Revelation Chapter 12 at Verses 12:6 and 12:14 as follows: v. 12:6, "And the woman fled into the wilderness, where she hath a place prepared of God, that they should feed her there a thousand two hundred and threescore days. v. 12:14 "And to the woman were given two wings of a great eagle, that she might fly into the wilderness, into her place, where she is nourished for a time, and times, and half a time, from the face of the serpent." I realize that there are multiple theories that explain how these two raptures are one or that one or the other is as you have said. However, the fact is that these two exist in the same chapter and each has a period of time that appears to be 3.5 years. So there are multiple variables as to how this may go together and you have stated one possibility. For instance, I do agree that the second rapture may be for the tribe of Judah at Jerusalem; however, it may not be exclusively Judah who repopulates the earth. As a matter of fact, I do like the idea of the second rapture being exclusively Judah. That makes so much since because Ron Wyatt found the Ark of the Covenant there and in my opinion it will be brought out in defense of Judah at the second rapture or close to it. I suppose it would be beneficial to discover when the Ark of the Covenant was used by Israel (the 12 tribes), and if it was ever used by Judah exclusively; after the 10 tribes were taken by Assyria. I do not think the Ark of the Covenant was ever used by Judah exclusively. Only that Jeremiah hid it as Ron Wyatt explains prior to the fall of Jerusalem to Neb. Thus, Judah did not use the Ark of the Covenant against Babylon; not that I can see anyway. So, I would tend to believe that all 12 tribes must be present when the Ark of the Covenant is used again and not only Judah. There are so many variables that for me to settle on a church doctrine simply will not work. I am convinced that all the information is to be found in the BoR. To be honest Borra, I don't see any Raptures in chapter 12. The Rapture of the Church happens before the 70th week/Tribulation period, whichever verbiage you prefer. And when Jesus returns at the Second Coming he's not going anywhere for at least 1000 years. So there won't need to be a Rapture. Now there are three Harvests. The Raptured Bride is harvested in Rev. 14:14, Israel is Harvested as the Wheat and the Tares are Harvested as the Wicked, they are bound up and readied to be burned at a future time (1000 years later). The BoR is a giant code book, the code is found in the Old Testament. God Bless.........
|
|
|
Post by boraddict on Dec 10, 2018 8:40:37 GMT -6
But those taken in the rapture are changed. We will not be married, will not produce more children. For example, Philippians 3:20-21 "...we await a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ, who will transform our lowly body to be like His glorious body." See also 1 Cor 15:51-53 The perishable will be changed to be imperishable. We will be living in the New Jerusalem. John 14:1-4 In Our Father's house. We will not be the ones to repopulate the earth. There are not two raptures in Rev 12. The "second rapture" that you see is God hiding the believing remnant of the Jews on earth in the wilderness (probably the area of ancient Edom in present day Jordan). Then the Anti-Christ empowered by Satan (the dragon) goes off to kill the Christians (we call them the Tribulation Saints) Rev 12:17. These Jews are still alive when Jesus returns. They will help populate the earth during the 1000 years. (I can get you Scriptures if you want them) (For the Jews being in Edom see Isaiah 63:1-6, Micah 2:12 Bozrah means "sheep pen", Isaiah 34:6) I would like to make the suggestion that you step back from studying Revelation and study other Scriptures. I know that Revelation holds the most interest to you, but I think studying the rest of Scripture will only enhance your understanding of Revelation. I think you are missing things by focusing on this book alone. Or this list would be a great place for you to start: www.johnsnotes.com/documents/OldTestamentReferencesintheBookofRevelation.pdfVery impressive......and good advice to boot. Out of the 404 verses in Revelation I think 289 have references to the Old Testament. When I heard that years ago, and was told that in order to understand the BoR one had to use the Old Testament as a "CODE BOOK" to interpret it, everything in the BoR opened up to me. The Woman in Rev. 12 is thus seen as Israel (Gen. 37:9) etc. I don't see any Rapture in Rev. 12, I don't buy into the Heavenly sign in HEAVEN theory at all, others do, but I think the scriptures say different, and I have to remain true to scriptures. In Rev. 15 we see an Angel sees another "Sign in Heaven" and it's about the coming Seve Vials being readied. They are being readied in the Temple in Heaven, the one the earthly Temple was patterned after, it's in Heaven, thus its seen as a sign in heaven. The reason Rev. 12 starts out as a sign in heaven is its about Satan who is in Heaven, and then is cast out of Heaven by Michael (SEE Daniel 12:1-2, Michael stands up). The Chapter is about Satan being cast to earth and thus chasing the Woman (Israel) into the Wilderness (Petra, most likely) via the Anti-Christ but God protecting her on "EAGLES WINGS" and God is called eagles wings in the Old Testament, which is why that was good advice, everyone needs to understand that the Old Testament is a code book for the BoR. Exodus 19:4 Ye have seen what I did unto the Egyptians, and how I bare you on eagles' wings, and brought you unto myself. Deuteronomy 32:11 As an eagle stirs up its nest and hovers over its young, He spread His wings to catch them; He carried them on His pinions. God is seen as an Eagles wings many times in the Old Testament, protecting Israel. I see Rev. 12:1-5 as an ENCODED MESSAGE to tell us the players in the Chapter. The Red Dragon is Satan, the Woman is Israel and the Male Child (proper translation is MALE not MAN) that Ascends to Heaven (Jesus). Then the Prophecy starts in verse 6. Israel flees unto the Wilderness at the halfway point of the 70th week or the tribulation period. That is why she needs to hide in the Wilderness (under God's wings) for 1260 days until Jesus' Second Coming. The Rapture has already happened, pre tribulation, IMHO. Thus I see no Rapture here, some say so, but I do not see it. Satan is cast out of Heaven, then after failing to get at he Jews who fled, he goes after the Christian's who repented after the Rapture, thus they become Martyrs. Good link, I bookmarked it, thanks. Thanks Rondon. You have several assumptions in your theory of which some I agree with and some I do not as follows: 1) "in order to understand the BoR one had to use the Old Testament as a "CODE BOOK" to interpret it, everything in the BoR opened up to me." Since you did not see the rapture in Verse 18:21 as I have just recently accomplished then the "code book" did not do its intended purpose and the BoR was not opened up all the way for you. 2) "The reason Rev. 12 starts out as a sign in heaven is its about Satan who is in Heaven, and then is cast out of Heaven by Michael (SEE Daniel 12:1-2, Michael stands up)." One particular false doctrine in the church today is the idea that Satan is at this time in heaven. In reality, Satan is on the earth and has been since Adam. 3) "The Chapter is about Satan being cast to earth and thus chasing the Woman (Israel) into the Wilderness (Petra, most likely) via the Anti-Christ but God protecting her on "EAGLES WINGS" and God is called eagles wings in the Old Testament, which is why that was good advice, everyone needs to understand that the Old Testament is a code book for the BoR. " First of all, everyone does not need to understand the Old Testament is a code book for the BoR because it is not. True, you can learn the linguistic devises there, but you can also learn them in the BoR. Thus, as code books go, the BoR is its own code book. Secondly, the chapter emphasis is the war that is in the central position of the chapter and this is proved by the chiasmus. 4) "the Male Child (proper translation is MALE not MAN) that Ascends to Heaven (Jesus)." The proper translation is man child as referenced in Verses 12:5, 6, as well as Isa. 66:7 among others. Thus, it is a man who is a child of the church and this is not Lord Jesus but John, the author of the book. He is the child of the church and as such has a responsibility to share the gospel message as referenced in Chapter 10 as eating the little book. It is John who teaches the message not only in his first work but also his second. Thus, he is to prophesy again (v. 10:11) and it is for that reason that he is preserved (v. 12:5) as stipulated to in Psalms 110:1, "The Lord (John) said unto my Lord (Jesus) sit thou at my right hand until I make thine enemies thy footstool." That is, John has been given the keys of authority (Rev. 1:18) from Lord Jesus and as such will in the name of the Lord destroy them (Pslams 118:10-12). We see at this time the nation state of Israel being surrounded. John under Lord Jesus is the key player in that nations defense. 5) "Satan is cast out of Heaven, then after failing to get at he Jews who fled, he goes after the Christian's who repented after the Rapture, thus they become Martyrs." There are several doctrines outlining the order of things. First of all, this order is suspect that Satan is in heaven with God. That is clearly false doctrine. Secondly, you have it that Satan fails to get the the Jews who fled and then he goes after the Christians who repented after the rapture. There is not absolute proof to this line of events. Only yours or some church doctrine. What church teaches this doctrine?
|
|
|
Post by Natalie on Dec 10, 2018 8:46:54 GMT -6
boraddict- Jesus Himself explains what you see as the "second rapture". Matthew 24:15 "So when you see the abomination of desolation spoken of by the prophet Daniel, standing in the holy place (let the reader understand), then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains." In the passage in Revelation, the two wings Israel is given is God's protection as they flee. (as rondomonson pointed out in a post above) That whole chapter goes along with the book of Revelation. Scripture interprets Scripture.
|
|
|
Post by Natalie on Dec 10, 2018 8:57:07 GMT -6
Very impressive......and good advice to boot. Out of the 404 verses in Revelation I think 289 have references to the Old Testament. When I heard that years ago, and was told that in order to understand the BoR one had to use the Old Testament as a "CODE BOOK" to interpret it, everything in the BoR opened up to me. The Woman in Rev. 12 is thus seen as Israel (Gen. 37:9) etc. I don't see any Rapture in Rev. 12, I don't buy into the Heavenly sign in HEAVEN theory at all, others do, but I think the scriptures say different, and I have to remain true to scriptures. In Rev. 15 we see an Angel sees another "Sign in Heaven" and it's about the coming Seve Vials being readied. They are being readied in the Temple in Heaven, the one the earthly Temple was patterned after, it's in Heaven, thus its seen as a sign in heaven. The reason Rev. 12 starts out as a sign in heaven is its about Satan who is in Heaven, and then is cast out of Heaven by Michael (SEE Daniel 12:1-2, Michael stands up). The Chapter is about Satan being cast to earth and thus chasing the Woman (Israel) into the Wilderness (Petra, most likely) via the Anti-Christ but God protecting her on "EAGLES WINGS" and God is called eagles wings in the Old Testament, which is why that was good advice, everyone needs to understand that the Old Testament is a code book for the BoR. Exodus 19:4 Ye have seen what I did unto the Egyptians, and how I bare you on eagles' wings, and brought you unto myself. Deuteronomy 32:11 As an eagle stirs up its nest and hovers over its young, He spread His wings to catch them; He carried them on His pinions. God is seen as an Eagles wings many times in the Old Testament, protecting Israel. I see Rev. 12:1-5 as an ENCODED MESSAGE to tell us the players in the Chapter. The Red Dragon is Satan, the Woman is Israel and the Male Child (proper translation is MALE not MAN) that Ascends to Heaven (Jesus). Then the Prophecy starts in verse 6. Israel flees unto the Wilderness at the halfway point of the 70th week or the tribulation period. That is why she needs to hide in the Wilderness (under God's wings) for 1260 days until Jesus' Second Coming. The Rapture has already happened, pre tribulation, IMHO. Thus I see no Rapture here, some say so, but I do not see it. Satan is cast out of Heaven, then after failing to get at he Jews who fled, he goes after the Christian's who repented after the Rapture, thus they become Martyrs. Good link, I bookmarked it, thanks. Thanks Rondon. You have several assumptions in your theory of which some I agree with and some I do not as follows: 1) "in order to understand the BoR one had to use the Old Testament as a "CODE BOOK" to interpret it, everything in the BoR opened up to me." Since you did not see the rapture in Verse 18:21 as I have just recently accomplished then the "code book" did not do its intended purpose and the BoR was not opened up all the way for you. 2) "The reason Rev. 12 starts out as a sign in heaven is its about Satan who is in Heaven, and then is cast out of Heaven by Michael (SEE Daniel 12:1-2, Michael stands up)." One particular false doctrine in the church today is the idea that Satan is at this time in heaven. In reality, Satan is on the earth and has been since Adam. 3) "The Chapter is about Satan being cast to earth and thus chasing the Woman (Israel) into the Wilderness (Petra, most likely) via the Anti-Christ but God protecting her on "EAGLES WINGS" and God is called eagles wings in the Old Testament, which is why that was good advice, everyone needs to understand that the Old Testament is a code book for the BoR. " First of all, everyone does not need to understand the Old Testament is a code book for the BoR because it is not. True, you can learn the linguistic devises there, but you can also learn them in the BoR. Thus, as code books go, the BoR is its own code book. Secondly, the chapter emphasis is the war that is in the central position of the chapter and this is proved by the chiasmus. 4) "the Male Child (proper translation is MALE not MAN) that Ascends to Heaven (Jesus)." The proper translation is man child as referenced in Verses 12:5, 6, as well as Isa. 66:7 among others. Thus, it is a man who is a child of the church and this is not Lord Jesus but John, the author of the book. He is the child of the church and as such has a responsibility to share the gospel message as referenced in Chapter 10 as eating the little book. It is John who teaches the message not only in his first work but also his second. Thus, he is to prophesy again (v. 10:11) and it is for that reason that he is preserved (v. 12:5) as stipulated to in Psalms 110:1, "The Lord (John) said unto my Lord (Jesus) sit thou at my right hand until I make thine enemies thy footstool." That is, John has been given the keys of authority (Rev. 1:18) from Lord Jesus and as such will in the name of the Lord destroy them (Pslams 118:10-12). We see at this time the nation state of Israel being surrounded. John under Lord Jesus is the key player in that nations defense. 5) "Satan is cast out of Heaven, then after failing to get at he Jews who fled, he goes after the Christian's who repented after the Rapture, thus they become Martyrs." There are several doctrines outlining the order of things. First of all, this order is suspect that Satan is in heaven with God. That is clearly false doctrine. Secondly, you have it that Satan fails to get the the Jews who fled and then he goes after the Christians who repented after the rapture. There is not absolute proof to this line of events. Only yours or some church doctrine. What church teaches this doctrine? I am not rondonmonson, but I am going to answer my opinion on your points here since I am currently online: 1)Scripture interprets Scripture. If something you see in the BoR contradicts something in another part of the Bible then either your interpretation is wrong or Scripture is wrong. You must take other Scripture into account. That is what it is meant by the OT being the "code." The OT helps explain Revelation. (I would say that there are passages in the NT that do, too) 2) Satan currently has access to heaven and earth. Read the book of Job. This is not false doctrine. 3) Again, Scripture interprets Scripture. It benefits a person to understand the OT in order to understand the New. As one person put it "the New Testament is in the Old concealed, the Old is in the New revealed" You don't simply learn the linguistic devices...you learn the truths of God which help in understanding His Word. 4) I've addressed your false interpretation of Psalm 110 before. Your are very off in your understanding here. 5) see point three about Satan. And, most biblically sound end times teaching churches teach the order that rondonmonson outlined.
|
|
|
Post by cwood85 on Dec 10, 2018 9:09:41 GMT -6
boraddict says: First off I want to clarify that me analyzing this the way I am going to below, is not picking on you. I am no expert on this but there are things being suggested in this thread as matter of fact and some of it is a little alarming in regards to no other scriptures are being used to back up these suggestions and similar. Tone cannot be conveyed via text and all is being written in a friendly manner and to get some serious questioning and thinking to hopefully occur. My responses, questions, and etc. are in color. 3) Verse 20:6 is a great find and I am surprised to see it in the context of the two raptures in Chapter 12 as you have used it. However, this verses seems to state the first resurrection in contrast to the second that is 1,000 years later. That the first resurrection is a resurrection of the dead in which the dead will not die a second death. In contrast, those of the second resurrection have a second death that is the spiritual death of not being with God for ever. Alright so help me out here on this. With the way you have broken things down, there will be two raptures and two resurrections? Why? What purpose does this serve? where else in scripture is this stated? Thus, those of the first resurrection are priests of God and of Christ and will reign with him for 1,000 years. That is, those of the first resurrection (not rapture So if it is not the rapture, than where do those in the rapture go while the first resurrection happens and those people reign with Jesus? Do they hang out somewhere else during this thousand years? Why wouldn't they also reign with Christ if they were raptured?) will live with God forever (no second death) and they are priests of God for the 1,000 year period of time. The priests are of the tribe of Ephraim that is the church ( Where is it said Ephraim is the church and why?); not Judah exclusively. That is, the priests are right here and right now learning and building their testimonies. It is they who will be called on the first rapture to do a work and the first resurrection is a part of that work. However, I do not know where in time the first resurrection takes place. According to Chapter 11, it begins when the two witnesses are called back to their bodies. 4) I think you are showing that the ruler of the kings of the earth is the Savior. Thus, the kings of the earth in the BoR are the priests who live on earth for the 1,000 years. Verse 7:15 shows that they will work in the temple among other things. ( Why exclusively kings? Kings and the church/Ephraim or Judah? Why would God exclusively pick the two? Why a physical temple or ark of the covenant? What purpose would this serve when the entire new testament states the complete opposite on Gods views of physical temples and actions. The ark of the covenant in the BoR is not the physical ark. The ark is where the law was kept and was a physical representation of Gods law that he has placed in our hearts. Why would a physical ark have any relevance on anything in regards to being significant?)5) I agree that the BoR is about redemption and victory through Christ. However, those who will not join that group will be removed from the earth. ( Which group and before, during, or after the thousand year reign?)In conclusion, it appears to me that two raptures exist as evidenced in Chapter 12. ( The woman in chapter 12 is the same woman, she is not two separate women in two seperate things raptures) Additionally, two resurrections exist. One of these resurrections take place somewhere during the two raptures, and the second resurrection is 1,000 years later. During that 1,000 years, the priests of God that are the kings of the earth work in the temple among other things. These kings of the earth are not the tribe of Judah exclusively but of all 12 tribes which are denoted as Ephraim; the tribe of adoption. That is, all 12 tribes as well as all people of the earth are adopted into the tribe of Ephraim and this is the church. Whereas, the tribe of Judah is the kingship tribe from which kings of the kingdom are derived. Thus, Ephraim is presided over by a king of Judah. Thus, the king of Judah is a priest of Ephraim. ( Help me out with these last few sentences as well with scriptures because I am not seeing or am missing this in the book of revelation.)
|
|
|
Post by Natalie on Dec 10, 2018 12:45:57 GMT -6
Using Rev 12, I am going to attempt to explain how Satan does still have access to heaven, and how rondonmonson and I (and others) get our timeline. It's pretty much a literal reading of Rev 12 and letting the text interpret the text. Which is how I believe we should first approach a passage.
1 Now a great sign appeared in heaven: a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet, and on her head a garland of twelve stars. (This woman represents Israel) 2 Then being with child, she cried out in labor and in pain to give birth. 3 And another sign appeared in heaven: behold, a great, fiery red dragon (this is a symbol of Satan and will be shown as such in a few verses) having seven heads and ten horns, and seven diadems on his heads. 4 His tail drew a third d of the stars of heaven and threw them to the earth. And the dragon stood before the woman who was ready to give birth, to devour her Child as soon as it was born. (Satan has always tried to stop the Messiah from coming) 5 She bore a male Child who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron. And her Child was caught up to God and His throne. (Satan did not stop the Messiah who now is at the Father's right hand) (In my opinion there is more to these verses but they have been discussed other places at great length and it's not necessary here, at least not for my purpose right now) 6 Then the woman fled into the wilderness, where she has a place prepared by God, that they should feed her there one thousand two hundred and sixty days. (The details of this verse is covered in 13-16)
7 And war broke out in heaven: Michael and his angels fought with the dragon; and the dragon and his angels fought, 8 but they did not prevail, nor was a place found for them in heaven any longer. 9 So the great dragon was cast out, that serpent of old, called the Devil and Satan, who deceives the whole world; he was cast to the earth, and his angels were cast out with him. (These three verses tell us who the dragon is, Satan, and that he had access to heaven, but after fighting Michael he was cast down permanently to earth) 10 Then I heard a loud voice saying in heaven, "Now salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of His Christ have come, for the accuser of our brethren, who accused them before our God day and night, has been cast down. (he had access to the throne of God, but no longer) 11 "And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb and by the word of their testimony, and they did not love their lives to the death. 12 "Therefore rejoice, O heavens, and you who dwell in them! Woe to the inhabitants of the earth and the sea! For the devil has come down to you, having great wrath, because he knows that he has a short time." (Satan knows time is up. His full purpose now is to destroy the Jews so that God's promises cannot be kept)
13 Now when the dragon saw that he had been cast to the earth, he persecuted the woman who gave birth to the male Child. (Satan goes after the Jews. The symbolic woman in verse one is the same woman here) 14 But the woman was given two wings of a great eagle, that she might fly into the wilderness to her place, where she is nourished for a time and times and half a time, from the presence of the serpent. (God protects Israel in the wilderness and Satan cannot destroy the Jewish nation. If this was a rapture verse then she would be protected somewhere heavenly, would she not?) 15 So the serpent spewed water out of his mouth like a flood after the woman, that he might cause her to be carried away by the flood. 16 But the earth helped the woman, and the earth opened its mouth and swallowed up the flood which the dragon had spewed out of his mouth. 17 And the dragon was enraged with the woman, and he went to make war with the rest of her offspring, who keep the commandments of God and have the testimony of Jesus Christ. (Satan cannot get the Jews so he goes after the Christians. Other verses in Revelation tells us that he will do this by the Anti-Christ)
|
|
rondonmonson
Truth Seeker
I can do all things through Christ which strengthens me....
Posts: 186
|
Post by rondonmonson on Dec 10, 2018 14:17:03 GMT -6
The Rapture happens before the 70th week/tribulation period called Jacob's Troubles. So since Babylon (Rev. 18) is being destroyed by God's Plagues (Seals, Trumpets and Vials) how can there be a Rapture in these passages of Rev. 18 ? This chapter kicks off at the earliest at the midway point when Jesus opens the First Seal. That is why Babylon (The World) is hit with these Plagues of God. Thus we disagree on there being a Rapture at that point in time, however the Rapture of the Church is "Secret" to the Old Testament anyway so there wouldn't be a coded scripture for it anyway, there are some vague references, but Paul stated the Rapture was a "MYSTERY" (Musterion or secret by God's silence). Scriptures say different sister, which is what we have to go by. Job 2:1-6 Again there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan also came among them to present himself before the LORD. The LORD said to Satan, "Where have you come from?" Then Satan answered the LORD and said, "From roaming about on the earth and walking around on it." The LORD said to Satan, "Have you considered My servant Job? For there is no one like him on the earth, a blameless and upright man fearing God and turning away from evil. And he still holds fast his integrity, although you incited Me against him to ruin him without cause." Satan answered the LORD and said, "Skin for skin! Yes, all that a man has he will give for his life. "However, put forth Your hand now, and touch his bone and his flesh; he will curse You to Your face." So the LORD said to Satan, "Behold, he is in your power, only spare his life." Revelation 12:10 Then I heard a loud voice in heaven, saying, "Now the salvation, and the power, and the kingdom of our God and the authority of His Christ have come, for the accuser of our brethren has been thrown down, he who accuses them before our God day and night. Satan is our accuser, he accuses us night and day, us as in the brethren in Christ Jesus. He is cast down at the midway point of the tribulation period, when Michael stands up, and we see that Michael kicks Satan out of Heaven in Rev. chapter 12. As we see in Daniel 12:1-2, this happens at the time of Great Troubles, when the Saints of old like Daniel will be resurrected. So Michael stands up at the END TIMES. Daniel 12:1-2 And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book. 2 And many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt. So Michael stands up to protect Israel at the END TIMES when Jacob's Troubles are happening, better known unto us as the Tribulation period. That is why we see the TIME, TIMES and a HALF [Time] here in Daniel 12:7 and in Rev. 12:14, it's another ENCODED MESSAGE which tells us the timing in which Michael casts out Satan. Thus reading Rev. 12 when does Michael kick Satan out of Heaven ? Well it has to be during Jacob's Troubles doesn't it sister ? This is why we have to use the Old Testament, almost everything in the BoR is John/Jesus giving it unto us in parables (CODE) so that only we can understand it, remember, Jesus stated that the reason he spoke in parables is so his people would understand, but those people of the world hearing would not hear and seeing would not see. Revelation is an encoded book. Put it all together, if Michael stands up at the Tribulation, where he protects Israel for a time, times and half [time] or 1260 days in Dan. 12, and Michael kicks Satan out of Heaven in Rev. 12 at the point in time when God protects Israel for a time, times and half [time] or 1260 days via eagles wings, when is Satan thus cast out of Heaven permanently ? At the midway point of the Tribulation can be the only logical answer sister. Satan is not in the 3rd Heaven, there are three Heavens, our Heaven of earth, the Heavens of the universe and the heaven where God resides. Satan can roam the earth and the Heavens and has access to the Lord, but not the Throne Room !! There is a Temple in Heaven and there is a Throne Room where God resides. Well all one has to do is study it sister. I can show you how it is encoded. In the Rev. 17 Harlotry picture, go read Daniel 5 the Mene, Mene, Tekel chapter. Like I stated, of the 404 verses in the BoR it has 289 verses that has Old Testament verbiage/lingo/references, so Jesus/John indeed encoded the BoR with the Old Testament. You need it to be MAN CHILD to assume its a Rapture I guess, I don't understand why, but the Greek word used in Rev. 12 means MALE CHILD not MAN CHILD, I will go look at the Isaiah verse you gave me, but it's a clash of basics, there can be no MAN-CHILD in reality, I have heard this Rapture theory and discounted it, how does it go ? The Church represents the MAN CHILD ? Here goes as per Isaiah 66:7, it means a MALE CHILD also, the translators did not write the word of God, they only translated it, and many times they translated it different from the original meaning. The KJV translators are not my "heros" per se and for that matter no man is, if they translated something well, which they did 95 percent of the time then kudos, it is my favorite version, but God's intention is more important to me than the KJV translators. From Isaiah 66:7 the Hebrew word used for man-child is ZAKAR which = STRONG'S #2145 זָכָר zakar {zaw-kawr'} from H2142; TWOT - 551e n m 1) male (of humans and animals) adj 2) male (of humans) —Brown-Driver-Briggs (Old Testament Hebrew-English Lexicon)
From H2142; properly remembered, that is, a male (of man or animals, as being the most noteworthy sex):— X him, male, man (child, -kind). —Strong's (Hebrew & Chaldee Dictionary of the Old Testament)
================================================================================================ From Revelation 12:5 the Greek word used for man-child is ARRHEN #0730 ἄρρην arrhen {ar'-hrane} or ἄρσην arsen {ar'-sane} probably from G0142; TDNT - n/a; adj —Greek Word Study (Transliteration-Pronunciation Etymology & Grammar)
1) a male —Thayer's (New Testament Greek-English Lexicon)
Probably from G0142; male (as stronger for lifting):—male, man. —Strong's (Greek Dictionary of the New Testament)
I don't really know why it matters, I was just pointing out that it really means a Male-Child, I think the argument is (not by the KJV translators but the people who see a Rapture here) that its a MALE CHILD and thus the Church. But the vision is a pretty easy read, it states that as soon as the MALE-CHILD is born, the Dragon tries to kill it and we know that Herod tried to kill all babies under 2 years of age and an Angel told Joseph and Mary to flee unto Egypt to avoid this encounter. So the passage fits a baby or Male-Child which she brought forth, who eventually ascended to Heaven. I personally don't see that big a difference, but the picture I see Jesus/John painting is a Dragon (Satan) trying to slay the Woman (Israel's) Male Child Savior, Jesus Christ who eventually ascended to the right hand of the Father in the Throne Room. Satan is cast down to earth permanently and is ANGRY, we know its at the end times because Rev. 12 says so. Rev. 12:12 Therefore rejoice, ye heavens, and ye that dwell in them. Woe to the inhabiters of the earth and of the sea! f or the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, because he knoweth that he hath but a short time. {He has but a SHORT TIME to go when he is cast down unto earth. } The Holy Bible says this in verses 12:16-17 Rev. 12:16 And the earth helped the woman, and the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed up the flood which the dragon cast out of his mouth. 17 And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ. Verse 16 is God using the earth like he did in the Exodus (Wall of fire, Sea parting etc.) to protect Israel, so Satan and the Anti-Christ get angry that they can not get at the Jews who fled Judea, Satan wants to kill all the Jews that way Jesus can not rule from Jerusalem with the Jews as prophesied, why do you think Hitler tried to kill all the Jews ? But of course Satan always does things that are used against him, Hitler led to the REBIRTH of Israel !! So after they get angry that God protected the Jews in Petra, they go after the Christians who came unto Christ after the Rapture. It spells this out for us in verse 17. The Dragon and his Man of Sin go after Israel and fail, then they go after THE REMNANT (Small part that's left) of her (Israel's) SEED (Jesus is that seed, see Galatians 3:16, Paul says Jesus is THE SEED not of MANY seeds but of ONE SEED which is Christ Jesus). So in essence when the Jews are protected, the Anti-Christ goes after the REMNANT CHURCH that is on earth, he of course can't get at the Bride who is in Heaven having just married Jesus. These are the Martyrs of the 5th Seal under the Altar. Galatians 3:16 Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ. The Remnant of the SEED (Jesus) who keeps the commandments and have the testimony of Jesus Christ are those on earth who came unto Christ after the Rapture sister. I try to fit everything together like a Mosaic, I of course offer my understanding in juxtaposition to others, so there will be differences, of course, but I do not try and insist others must see things the way I do, or say others use false doctrine, even if think they are off kilter in their thinking. God Bless
|
|
|
Post by boraddict on Dec 10, 2018 19:35:17 GMT -6
I knew my last post would ignite the flame and sparks would fly. My excuse is that I was in such a hurry this morning but I felt that I needed respond. So I quickly typed my post knowing that I might get in trouble and I worried all day. That is so funny.
|
|
|
Post by boraddict on Dec 12, 2018 21:09:26 GMT -6
Recently I committed in marriage Revelation Chapter 6 to Chapter 7. So, now they are married like two love birds singing in a tree. Chapter 6 has always been a challenge not only for myself but for others as well. But when Rondon suggested that Chapter 6 emphasized the beast I was all in with a dual prophecy for that chapter. However, for chronological purposes, Chapter 6 had to take a stand. It was either with Chapter 5, or it was with Chapter 7, but not both. So I looked at the flow between the chapter groups to solve the problem as follows:
ch 1, 2, & 3, Chapter 1 flows into Chapter 2 that flows into Chapter 3. Chapter 3 does not flow into Chapter 4. ch 4 & 5, Chapter 4 flows into Chapter 5 that appears to flow into Chapter 6. However, it is simply an appearance of a flow from 5 to 6 but not an actual flow. Thus, Chapter 5 bridges into Chapter 6 for appearance purposes only. ch 6 & 7, Chapter 6 flows into Chapter 7. Chapter 7 does not flow into Chapter 8. ch 8, 9, 10, & 11, Chapter 8 flows into Chapter 9 that has an appearance of not flowing into Chapter 10. This association between Chapters 9 and 10 is the opposite of the bridge for appearance between Chapters 5 and 6. Thus, Chapter 9 flows into Chapter 10 that flows into Chapter 11. Chapter 11 does not flow into Chapter 12. ch 12, Chapter 12 does not flow into Chapter 13. ch 13 & 14 , Chapter 13 flows into Chapter 14 via "who is able to make war with him (the beast)?" (v. 13:4). The answer follows in Chapter 14. Thus, Chapter 13 flows into Chapter 14. Chapter 14 does not flow into Chapter 15. ch 15 & 16, Chapter 15 flows into Chapter 16. Chapter 16 does not flow into Chapter 17 but has a bridge for appearance that is similar to that of Chapters 5 and 6. ch 17, 18, & 19, Chapter 17 flows into Chapter 18 that flows into Chapter 19. This is the same pattern as Chapters 1, 2 and 3. ch 20, 21, & 22, Chapter 20 flows into Chapter 21 that flows into Chapter 22.
Thus, we have the pattern: 1, flow to 2, flow to 3, not flow to 4, as follows:
1 f 2 f 3 nf 4 = (f, f) 4 f 5 nf 6 = (f), the nf is an appearance of a flow 6 f 7 nf 8 = (f) 8 f 9 f 10 f 11 nf 12 = (f, f, f), appearance of a non-flow 12 nf 13 13 f 14 nf 15 = (f) 15 f 16 nf 17 = (f), the nf is an appearance of a flow 17 f 18 f 19 nf 20 = (f, f) 20 f 21 f 22 = (f, f)
As you can see, this format emphasizes the transition between Chapters 9 and 10 and this is reasonable because this is where the seventh angel begins in the list of seven angels as follows:
1st angel (v. 8:7) 2nd angel (v. 8:8) 3rd angel (v. 8:10) 4th angel (v. 8:12) 5th angel (v. 9:1) 6th angel (vv. 9:13-15) 7th angel (vv. 10:1-11:15)
Thus, it is reasonable that a flow exists between Chapters 11 and 12 with respect to this 7th angel. Because, we have the following pattern:
ch 1-3, messages to the churches 4-5, the king upon the throne 6-7, the beast vs. the 144,000. That is, the beast attacks the king and his army of 144,000. 8-11, a list building from 4 fictitious angels to two angels of the woes that are the 144,000, and lastly the angel of the third woe that leads the 144,000. Since the angel of the third woe encompasses Chapters 10 and 11, then it is reasonable that this angel continues into Chapter 12, and it does as the emphasis of that Chapter and this is Michael leading the 144,000. 13-14, the two woes are referenced again as the beast having control and then the 144,000 having control 15-16, the third woe is referenced again as the seven angels culminating in the destruction by the seventh. 17-20, again the three woes as the attack by the beast, God's response, and the capture of Satan. I had not seen Chapter 20 represented as the third woe prior to this analysis. Thus the pattern is revised to:
1 f 2 f 3 nf 4 = (f, f) 4 f 5 nf 6 = (f), the nf is an appearance of a flow 6 f 7 nf 8 = (f) 8 f 9 f 10 f 11 nf 12 = (f, f, f), appearance of a non-flow 12 nf 13 13 f 14 nf 15 = (f) 15 f 16 nf 17 = (f), the nf is an appearance of a flow 17 f 18 f 19 f 20 nf 21 = (f, f, f), appearance of a non-flow 21 f 22 = (f)
This seems to indicate the following: 1st woe the beast takes the world 2nd woe the Savior frees the world 3rd woe Satan is captured and bound
|
|