servantofthelord
Truth Seeker
Come, Lord Jesus. The grace of the Lord Jesus be with all. Amen.
Posts: 164
Favorite Verse: Anything from John
Favorite Song: Feelin Good!- Nina Simone
Favorite Animal: Blue, my mini schnauzer
Favorite Food: potatoes
Dream Vacation: To actually go on one, never been
Profession: Artist/Poet/Carpenter/Servant
Denomination: Servant of all
I'm From: All over
|
Post by servantofthelord on Jul 13, 2021 18:43:34 GMT -6
Ok, I'm in the middle of a comprehensive study of Revelations. Since the rapture is obviously linked, I'm also studying this. I'm looking for any verses that either directly describe or insinuate this. After searching several bible sites, these are the ones I've come up with. If you have any that are not listed, please share the book and verse numbers. Thanks. I'm not debating which are good or not, just collecting any pertinent verses to look at.
Daniel 12:1-2, Matthew 24:30-31, Matthew 25:1-13, Mark 13:24-32, Luke 10:20, Luke 17:34-37, John 14:3, Acts 1:7-8, Romans 8:18-19, 1 Corinthians 15:52, Philippians 3:20-21, 1 Thessalonians 5:1-8, 1 Thessalonians 4:16-18, 2 Thessalonians 2:1-4, Rev. 1:7, Rev. 3:10, Rev.11:15-19, Rev. 20:2-5,
|
|
|
Post by Natalie on Jul 13, 2021 19:20:09 GMT -6
Isaiah 26:19-21
|
|
|
Post by mike on Jul 14, 2021 6:10:02 GMT -6
Job 19:26-27
|
|
|
Post by Gary on Jul 14, 2021 9:11:05 GMT -6
Thinking also:
Deuteronomy 32:20-21 Isaiah 66:7–9 Zephaniah 2:1-3 Acts 15:14-16 Revelation 4:1-2 Revelation 5:9-10 Revelation 12:5 Revelation 12:12
|
|
servantofthelord
Truth Seeker
Come, Lord Jesus. The grace of the Lord Jesus be with all. Amen.
Posts: 164
Favorite Verse: Anything from John
Favorite Song: Feelin Good!- Nina Simone
Favorite Animal: Blue, my mini schnauzer
Favorite Food: potatoes
Dream Vacation: To actually go on one, never been
Profession: Artist/Poet/Carpenter/Servant
Denomination: Servant of all
I'm From: All over
|
Post by servantofthelord on Jul 14, 2021 15:17:38 GMT -6
First off, thanks to those who have contributed to my study with additional verses! I have added them onto the pages of my study for further consideration. I'm realizing that my question was perhaps inadequately defined. My apologies. In order to study the "rapture", and to get aid from you all, I'll need to establish a few things that are commonly agreed, so as to prevent misunderstanding in my intent and in any findings I post. First perhaps I should state what I'm not doing. I'm not trying to prove or disprove any particular idea on the rapture. I have never placed my beliefs into a specific nailed down timeline. I know for certain we are going to enter into God's kingdom, if we are faithful and do his works, as the gospels lay out for us. I'm sure that is agreed by all, as it is repeatedly stated all through the New Testament. First off I suppose we need to examine what being "raptured" actually means. The common understanding of it as I understand it, is it related primarily to the word harpazo. Meaning taken or caught up. So being raptured must then involve us leaving the "earth" and entering "heaven". This by necessity forces us to define "heaven", that we may be assured we are agreeing where we are to be raptured too. It does little good to agree we are taken up, if we have no concept of what and where "up" is. I know this seems self explanatory, but scripture has much to say about this, and we all seem to have varied ideas on where "heaven" is, not to mention what it is. The best description I have heard of "what" heaven is, is also the most basic. It has the benefit of being both scriptural and simplistic. "Heaven" is the dwelling place of God. I'll assume that is agreed upon by all and continue. For the purposes of clarification, we need to distinguish from "the heavens". That term is commonly used to describe the sky in general, not always the dwelling place of the Lord. Further we must look at another additional twist. The dwelling place of the Father vs. the dwelling place of the Son. This is needed because we all know that the Father didn't and doesn't take form and reside on earth. He eternally resides in "heaven". Since both Father and Son are God, "heaven" is more than one place at times. Or perhaps a better description is there is more than one heaven. Since scripture says we will be with Jesus, reign with Him and be in His presence, we will leave the Supposition of the Fathers dwelling in particular out of the discussion, other than to touch on it here. That is unless someone can show me where the Father is said to be inhabiting the same place as Jesus does at all times, as opposed to being in and with him at all times. Here we need to pause and I will quickly touch on something that is pertinent to this discussion, that I find most people either don't know, or have not considered. However it was known and accepted by all the apostles churches and the first Christians for at least the first 3 centuries. It is well elaborated in the thousands of pages of writings we have available to us. They can be found online freely at the Christian Classics Ethereal Library here. ( www.ccel.org/ ) The collected works run about 700 to 1,000 dollars to buy, so I'd recommend reading online and or printing them if you are interested in studying the history of Christianity. Back to topic. While the creator is the Father, all things were created through the Son, whom the Father gave authority over all things on/in the earth. John beautifully explains that in the beginning of His book. It is in many other places as well, but no need to cover that topic excessively here. All the mentions of God in the Old Testament, that do not directly call Him Father, are Jesus. It was him that tabernacled with the Jews, Him that visited Abraham, and Him that was in the garden with Adam and Eve. He even says as much in places. "None have seen the Father but the Son." So, when Jesus tabernacled with the Jews, heaven was on earth, for God dwelled among them. Jesus is coming back to reign here on earth, so when He returns, heaven will be here, not in the sky. So any rapture that happens, must happen before His return. For at that time heaven and earth become one, and you cant be taken up to where you already are. This is why I have never understood the statement post tribulation rapture. Tribulation ends when Jesus returns to reign, so you can't be raptured to Him when He is already here. However, if you mean the term to describe being spiritually transformed into our new garments or bodies, then you can be raptured at judgment day or prior. The issue with that use is it is just substituting rapture for the moment of conception into eternal life, not being taken anywhere, but rather being transformed. So, for this study, we will hopefully all agree to rapture meaning being taken up, therefore, by definition, it must occur prior to the second coming. I hope this set of definitions is acceptable and agreeable to all. If not, we can examine further the specifics and terminology in another thread. Now to how this study is conducted and what is hoped to be achieved. This began with a study into the book of Revelations, for obvious reasons. Those being that the time is near and I want to be fully prepared for what is to come. Since rapture beliefs are enter-twined in end days discussion, I decided it was best to study both at the same time, rather than try to divide what is linked. Because I have no bias to any timing or teachings on this, I will simply read and compare contrast scriptures, without attempting to prove or disprove any established beliefs. If I find there to be obvious scriptural support of a certain view on this, I'll adopt that as my own, rather than using my own to view scripture. We should always be careful when interpreting scripture to not read or conform scripture to our belief, but conform our beliefs to what scripture actually says. Thanks again to all, God bless! I'll post my paper/study here when it is completed, with scriptural references where needed, so you can study and come to your own informed conclusions.
|
|
|
Post by stormyknight on Jul 15, 2021 13:40:54 GMT -6
If you don't mind, I'd like to just post my thoughts within your post. First off, thanks to those who have contributed to my study with additional verses! I have added them onto the pages of my study for further consideration. I'm realizing that my question was perhaps inadequately defined. My apologies. In order to study the "rapture", and to get aid from you all, I'll need to establish a few things that are commonly agreed, so as to prevent misunderstanding in my intent and in any findings I post. First perhaps I should state what I'm not doing. I'm not trying to prove or disprove any particular idea on the rapture. I have never placed my beliefs into a specific nailed down timeline. I know for certain we are going to enter into God's kingdom,( The best definition of God's Kingdom is from Jesus Himself, "Jesus answered, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God. 6That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. Do not marvel that I said to you, ‘You must be born again.’ The wind blows where it wishes, and you hear its sound, but you do not know where it comes from or where it goes. So it is with everyone who is born of the Spirit.” John 3:5-8) if we are faithful and do his works( "He saved us, not by the righteous deeds we had done, but according to His mercy, through the washing of new birth and renewal by the Holy Spirit." Titus 3:5), as the gospels lay out for us. I'm sure that is agreed by all, as it is repeatedly stated all through the New Testament. First off I suppose we need to examine what being "raptured" actually means. The common understanding of it as I understand it, is it related primarily to the word harpazo. Meaning taken or caught up. So being raptured must then involve us leaving the "earth" and entering "heaven". This by necessity forces us to define "heaven", that we may be assured we are agreeing where we are to be raptured too. It does little good to agree we are taken up, if we have no concept of what and where "up" is. I know this seems self explanatory, but scripture has much to say about this, and we all seem to have varied ideas on where "heaven" is, not to mention what it is. The best description I have heard of "what" heaven is, is also the most basic. It has the benefit of being both scriptural and simplistic. "Heaven" is the dwelling place of God. I'll assume that is agreed upon by all and continue. For the purposes of clarification, we need to distinguish from "the heavens". That term is commonly used to describe the sky in general, not always the dwelling place of the Lord. Further we must look at another additional twist. The dwelling place of the Father vs. the dwelling place of the Son. This is needed because we all know that the Father didn't and doesn't take form and reside on earth. He eternally resides in "heaven". I agree with you on your differences of 'Heaven'(spiritual plane) and 'the heavens(physical plane). Right now there are two kingdoms, if you will. The Kingdom of Heaven, God, Jesus, and all the Holy Angels. And then there is the dominion of darkness, Col. 1:13, Satan's dominion(spiritual plane) that we currently live in(physical plane).Since both Father and Son are God, "heaven" is more than one place at times. Or perhaps a better description is there is more than one heaven. Since scripture says we will be with Jesus, reign with Him and be in His presence, we will leave the Supposition of the Fathers dwelling in particular out of the discussion, other than to touch on it here. That is unless someone can show me where the Father is said to be inhabiting the same place as Jesus does at all times, as opposed to being in and with him at all times. Here we need to pause and I will quickly touch on something that is pertinent to this discussion, that I find most people either don't know, or have not considered. However it was known and accepted by all the apostles churches and the first Christians for at least the first 3 centuries. It is well elaborated in the thousands of pages of writings we have available to us. They can be found online freely at the Christian Classics Ethereal Library here. ( www.ccel.org/ ) The collected works run about 700 to 1,000 dollars to buy, so I'd recommend reading online and or printing them if you are interested in studying the history of Christianity. Back to topic. While the creator is the Father, all things were created through the Son, whom the Father gave authority over all things on/in the earth. John beautifully explains that in the beginning of His book. It is in many other places as well, but no need to cover that topic excessively here. All the mentions of God in the Old Testament, that do not directly call Him Father, are Jesus. It was him that tabernacled with the Jews, Him that visited Abraham, and Him that was in the garden with Adam and Eve. He even says as much in places. "None have seen the Father but the Son." So, when Jesus tabernacled with the Jews, heaven was on earth, for God dwelled among them. I grew up in the Catholic church, so God the Father was an old man, Jesus was a young man, beaten and scarred and hanging on a cross, and the Holy Spirit was a bird. Jesus told us in His own words, "I and the Father are one.” John 10:30 What you said earlier about the Father didn't and doesn't take form and reside on the Earth, I would contend that, yes He did. He is Jesus, and Jesus was and will be the physical form of God the Father. Jesus is coming back to reign here on earth, so when He returns, heaven will be here, not in the sky. So any rapture that happens, must happen before His return. For at that time heaven and earth become one, and you cant be taken up to where you already are. This is why I have never understood the statement post tribulation rapture. Tribulation ends when Jesus returns to reign, so you can't be raptured to Him when He is already here. However, if you mean the term to describe being spiritually transformed into our new garments or bodies, then you can be raptured at judgment day or prior. The issue with that use is it is just substituting rapture for the moment of conception into eternal life, not being taken anywhere, but rather being transformed. So, for this study, we will hopefully all agree to rapture meaning being taken up, therefore, by definition, it must occur prior to the second coming. I hope this set of definitions is acceptable and agreeable to all. If not, we can examine further the specifics and terminology in another thread. Now to how this study is conducted and what is hoped to be achieved. This began with a study into the book of Revelations, for obvious reasons. Those being that the time is near and I want to be fully prepared for what is to come. Since rapture beliefs are enter-twined in end days discussion, I decided it was best to study both at the same time, rather than try to divide what is linked. Because I have no bias to any timing or teachings on this, I will simply read and compare contrast scriptures, without attempting to prove or disprove any established beliefs. If I find there to be obvious scriptural support of a certain view on this, I'll adopt that as my own, rather than using my own to view scripture. We should always be careful when interpreting scripture to not read or conform scripture to our belief, but conform our beliefs to what scripture actually says. Thanks again to all, God bless! I'll post my paper/study here when it is completed, with scriptural references where needed, so you can study and come to your own informed conclusions. Also, at the beginning of your post you stated what you are not doing, but, I don't see your explanation of "what is hoped to be achieved" except that you will adopt as your own view the view that has obvious scriptural support. What are you hoping to achieve by this study? Honest question, not attacking or trying to be condescending. May the Holy Spirit guide you and your study and bring you to an even closer relationship with our Lord and Savior and soon coming King, Jesus Christ.
|
|
servantofthelord
Truth Seeker
Come, Lord Jesus. The grace of the Lord Jesus be with all. Amen.
Posts: 164
Favorite Verse: Anything from John
Favorite Song: Feelin Good!- Nina Simone
Favorite Animal: Blue, my mini schnauzer
Favorite Food: potatoes
Dream Vacation: To actually go on one, never been
Profession: Artist/Poet/Carpenter/Servant
Denomination: Servant of all
I'm From: All over
|
Post by servantofthelord on Jul 15, 2021 14:55:56 GMT -6
If you don't mind, I'd like to just post my thoughts within your post. Thanks for your response! I'll try to address them as best I'm able. I cut and pasted your comments, so as not to end up with an enormously long post. Others interested can refer to the longer original and/or yours. Also, at the beginning of your post you stated what you are not doing, but, I don't see your explanation of "what is hoped to be achieved" except that you will adopt as your own view the view that has obvious scriptural support. What are you hoping to achieve by this study? Honest question, not attacking or trying to be condescending.Perfectly legit and understandable question. My end goal is the same as my beginning goal, to learn. To often learning is affected by what we already know. If we read something with a result already in mind, we, by nature, tend to see that result in what we read, whether we see it is stated or "feel" it is inferred. I chose originally to do a study in Revelations, primarily due to the state the world is in and the real possibility that we may indeed live in the end days, literally and figuratively. So understanding the events and etc. seemed to be a prudent thing. Looking at other peoples studies of this showed me that there is no really established hard rule of understanding that which is made up of literal and figurative speech and contains instruction and visions intermingled. Since I firmly believe that scripture was intended to be understood by the common man and the scholar, with no bias to either, I felt a personal understanding of it, void of preconception, was a beneficial thing to pursue. I'm not going to claim any scriptural authority or even that what I find is the only possibility. Just that it will be based in scripture and devoid of a preconceived notion as to it's meaning and intent. Since rapture theology is, by it's very definition, linked to the end days. It seemed logical to study both at the same time, otherwise I'd risk forming an opinion of one, based on finding of another. This way, in my opinion, each should bear out the other and in so doing, give me a better understanding and also be based in the scriptures not in church teachings and any traditions picked up along the way. It may in fact confirm both of the previous, or not. But I see no more clear path in which to study and understand these topics, short of arbitrarily choosing one and trying to prove or disprove it. Which seems the absolute wrong way to learn. I hope this answers your query. May the Holy Spirit guide you and your study and bring you to an even closer relationship with our Lord and Savior and soon coming King, Jesus Christ. (The best definition of God's Kingdom is from Jesus Himself, "Jesus answered, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God. 6That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. Do not marvel that I said to you, ‘You must be born again.’ The wind blows where it wishes, and you hear its sound, but you do not know where it comes from or where it goes. So it is with everyone who is born of the Spirit.” John 3:5-8) if we are faithful and do his works ("He saved us, not by the righteous deeds we had done, but according to His mercy, through the washing of new birth and renewal by the Holy Spirit." Titus 3:5)
The first part of your quotes above is both true and an opinion. Your scripture is just that, so it is obviously what it says, but the statement that it is the best definition, is a personal opinion. Not to say your wrong, but what best describes something is relative to the one describing it. Such as my description of a thing will relate to how I view it in relation to me and what I know and understand of it(my viewpoint), but in describing it to another, they may see the same thing, but describe it in different words. Language is funny like that. We learn it in english with the words that most closely relate/mean what the actual scriptures we used to translate from say, but the verse you quoted, to one who read it in Greek or Latin or Aramaic, may use a totally different set of words to describe the very same scripture. This is what I was referring to in a way, above. As english speakers, we say and interpret things by our personal language, though it is actually a translation of other words, that were translated into other words before we read them. It's not good or bad, just the nature of translation. But that is an entirely separate topic of discussion, only brought up to show a point. The second quotation is a topic I'd rather not even start here, perhaps on a separate thread at another time. Any discussion of faith and works is always going to offend someone no matter what I do, so better just to plead peace for the time being and leave it. I purposely included both in the statement without excluding or declaring either, for that purpose. both are required and important. That will have to suffice for this study, as it is of no bevefit to delve further into nuance here. I agree with you on your differences of 'Heaven'(spiritual plane) and 'the heavens(physical plane). Right now there are two kingdoms, if you will. The Kingdom of Heaven, God, Jesus, and all the Holy Angels. And then there is the dominion of darkness, Col. 1:13, Satan's dominion(spiritual plane) that we currently live in(physical plane).Here I'll leave each to there own beliefs on how many and what variety and the like. I only made ANY distinction, so that all would know what baseline I'm using, more or less. But it is a great discussion to be had in another thread at some point. I grew up in the Catholic church, so God the Father was an old man, Jesus was a young man, beaten and scarred and hanging on a cross, and the Holy Spirit was a bird. Jesus told us in His own words, "I and the Father are one.” John 10:30 What you said earlier about the Father didn't and doesn't take form and reside on the Earth, I would contend that, yes He did. He is Jesus, and Jesus was and will be the physical form of God the Father.I too was catholic, but that term is misunderstood. It simply means, or originally meant, universal. So being from the catholic church just meant you were Christian. Roman Catholic, which was my upbringing or part of it, is a wholly separate entity, which was founded when the roman kingdom was overtaken in all but the "western"/top part. When it for a time was the only place in that area you could openly be a Christian, later when the church attempted to unite, there was too much doctrinal separation for a "catholic" church. The Roman government had infiltrated the church and bishops were actually paid by them, among other things. This is another good topic for discussion, but not on this particular thread, since it has no direct connection to Revelations or rapture. I'll gladly discuss it if you'd like to begin a thread on the early church or church history. I posted a linkk to a place to read all you can absorb on the matter. I was also Southern baptist, my mother's side. So, as you can imagine religion in my childhood was nothing if not confusing. LOL God bless, and thanks for the questions and comments.
|
|
servantofthelord
Truth Seeker
Come, Lord Jesus. The grace of the Lord Jesus be with all. Amen.
Posts: 164
Favorite Verse: Anything from John
Favorite Song: Feelin Good!- Nina Simone
Favorite Animal: Blue, my mini schnauzer
Favorite Food: potatoes
Dream Vacation: To actually go on one, never been
Profession: Artist/Poet/Carpenter/Servant
Denomination: Servant of all
I'm From: All over
|
Post by servantofthelord on Jul 16, 2021 18:25:26 GMT -6
servantofthelord, Natalie, mike, Gary, stormyknight, if ya'll don't mind, I'd like some clarification. I don't want to do any study into the different schools of thought on the rapture just yet, as I don't want to risk biasing my study before I conclude it. But I do need a little clarification. Just simple basics, no reasoning or opinion, if you don't mind. Not yet anyway. I understand there to be 4 schools of thought on rapture. Those that don't believe it at all, those who are what is termed pre-tribulation, mid-tribulation, and post-tribulation. If I surmise correctly by simple word/linguistics, the pre thought is before the tribulation, mid is in the middle and post is after. Hopefully that is the correct basic thought. So the defining factor is the tribulation. since tribulations are ongoing even today, I take it to mean the "Great Tribulation", specifically. So hopefully, there is a consensus among the three as to what event or time, signifies the beginning/start of this event. What exactly would that be? If there is a specific verse that declares it, or some definite sign of it in scripture, that will suffice. If not a basic description will do nicely. Please consider that I'm not wanting a full explanation of any particular theory just yet, I merely wish to be sure I at least understand the most basic premise of these. Thanks in advance for saving me the time of trying to pinpoint and assume I am correct.
|
|
|
Post by sog on Jul 16, 2021 18:33:12 GMT -6
Again as I said in the “This is a survey and vote on the rapture” thread, there is another position. Pre-wrath. Separate and distinct from the others.
|
|
|
Post by Natalie on Jul 16, 2021 18:38:08 GMT -6
My understanding...
Pre-trib would be before the start of Daniel's 70th week. The term "Tribulation" would cover all 7 years with the last half being Great Tribulation.
Mid-trib would be before the last 3.5 years or the "Great Tribulation"
There is also pre-wrath which means the rapture happens before God's wrath takes place.
Post is at the Second Coming.
And then those who don't think there will be a rapture.
|
|
|
Post by sog on Jul 16, 2021 18:44:20 GMT -6
My understanding... Pre-trib would be before the start of Daniel's 70th week. The term "Tribulation" would cover all 7 years with the last half being Great Tribulation. Mid-trib would be before the last 3.5 years or the "Great Tribulation" There is also pre-wrath which means the rapture happens before God's wrath takes place. Post is at the Second Coming. And then those who don't think there will be a rapture. Natalie, just to clarify, Pre-wrath does believe before God’s wrath begins, but after the Abomination of Desolation (AoD) and before the Great tribulation ends.
|
|
servantofthelord
Truth Seeker
Come, Lord Jesus. The grace of the Lord Jesus be with all. Amen.
Posts: 164
Favorite Verse: Anything from John
Favorite Song: Feelin Good!- Nina Simone
Favorite Animal: Blue, my mini schnauzer
Favorite Food: potatoes
Dream Vacation: To actually go on one, never been
Profession: Artist/Poet/Carpenter/Servant
Denomination: Servant of all
I'm From: All over
|
Post by servantofthelord on Jul 16, 2021 18:56:56 GMT -6
|
|
servantofthelord
Truth Seeker
Come, Lord Jesus. The grace of the Lord Jesus be with all. Amen.
Posts: 164
Favorite Verse: Anything from John
Favorite Song: Feelin Good!- Nina Simone
Favorite Animal: Blue, my mini schnauzer
Favorite Food: potatoes
Dream Vacation: To actually go on one, never been
Profession: Artist/Poet/Carpenter/Servant
Denomination: Servant of all
I'm From: All over
|
Post by servantofthelord on Jul 16, 2021 18:59:36 GMT -6
sog, which event is considered the beginning of Gods wrath?
|
|
|
Post by boraddict on Jul 16, 2021 19:01:56 GMT -6
servantofthelord , Natalie , mike , Gary , stormyknight , if ya'll don't mind, I'd like some clarification. I don't want to do any study into the different schools of thought on the rapture just yet, as I don't want to risk biasing my study before I conclude it. But I do need a little clarification. Just simple basics, no reasoning or opinion, if you don't mind. Not yet anyway. I understand there to be 4 schools of thought on rapture. Those that don't believe it at all, those who are what is termed pre-tribulation, mid-tribulation, and post-tribulation. If I surmise correctly by simple word/linguistics, the pre thought is before the tribulation, mid is in the middle and post is after. Hopefully that is the correct basic thought. So the defining factor is the tribulation. since tribulations are ongoing even today, I take it to mean the "Great Tribulation", specifically. So hopefully, there is a consensus among the three as to what event or time, signifies the beginning/start of this event. What exactly would that be? If there is a specific verse that declares it, or some definite sign of it in scripture, that will suffice. If not a basic description will do nicely. Please consider that I'm not wanting a full explanation of any particular theory just yet, I merely wish to be sure I at least understand the most basic premise of these. Thanks in advance for saving me the time of trying to pinpoint and assume I am correct. Basically, 1) pre-tribulation is before the tribulation and this appears to be before the seals of Rev. 6 at Rev. 4. 2) mid-tribulation is the mid point of the tribulation that appears to be between the seals and trumpets and more specifically Rev. 8:1. 3) post-tribulation is after the tribulation and this appears to be after the bowls of Rev. 16. However, it seems to be generally accepted that the rapture occurring somewhere close to these three areas of time is considered to be within their definitions. Because, let's say that the tribulation began as a result of some event and we did not recognize that event as the beginning of the tribulation, and the rapture occurred five weeks later, then the rapture would still be considered pre-tribulation. The same goes for the mid and post rapture possibilities. There are many other possible definitions available to you and mine is not to be considered absolute.
|
|
|
Post by sog on Jul 16, 2021 19:02:17 GMT -6
No, I don’t believe that is correct. There is a specific event. The Abomination of Desolation is the specific event that divides the first part of the 70 weeks, or the first part of the 7 years from the second part of the 70 weeks (second part of the 7 years).
|
|