|
Post by yardstick on Nov 26, 2017 21:06:07 GMT -6
Here are some words that stand out to me from Isa 17: Damascus is clearly mentioned in 17:1, but Syria is called Aram. What other prophetic passages are there regarding Aram? Aroer is mentioned in 17:2. This is three cities in Israel (according to the lexicon), but does not describe which three. Wikipedia gives a little more detail: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aroer"a Biblical town on the north bank of the River Arnon to the east of the Dead Sea, in present-day Jordan...is the place of modern 'Ara'ir on the north bank of the Arnon ravine, about 11 miles (18 km) from the mouth of the river...it was assigned as part of the territory of the tribe of Reuben, whose southern frontier it marked..." The Isa 17:2 passage indicates the area, which will be forsaken, will still be habitable. It appears that no one will want to live there, however. 17:3 looks like it might be read as "Ephraim's fortifications, the sovereignty of Damascus and the remnant of Aram shall cease". This would make sense given the list of antagonists of Psa 83 if Syria was subsumed by either Turkey or Lebanon. With Damascus gone, the seat of Assad's power and the leadership of Syria in ruins, it wouldn't take much for Turkey (or even Iran) to annex Syria. This might explain why Syria is not listed in Psa 83: it is part of Turkey or Iran now. Ephraim's fortifications may be gone, because the 'agreement between many' resulting from the destruction of the antagonists (except maybe Turkey) might allow northern Israel to have a greater buffer between the Golan Heights and Israel's enemies, resulting in demilitarization of the area around Jerusalem. Note where Ephraim is geographically: Map of 12 Tribes allotments
I have heard Dr. J. Vernon McGee say that whenever you see the phrase "In that day" it refers to the Tribulation/Jacob's Trouble. I see it mentioned in 17:4, and so it looks like this verse could occur chronologically after the first 3, but during the Tribulation. The verse itself indicates that all the wealth of Israel will dissipate during the Tribulation. I am more convinced this has to do with the latter half, than the former half. However, if there are continuous wars in the area, during the first half, it would not surprise me at all to see that it is the wars which impoverish Israel. That is what war does to a nation, losers moreso than winners, but there is still a negative economic effect. I am going to stop here for now, and let others get their two coppers in.
|
|
|
Post by boraddict on Nov 26, 2017 22:08:28 GMT -6
Damascus is a hard subject for me. Her fall has already taken place; however, to be completely fallen is for the government to be destroyed. Thus, we are waiting for the fall of the Syrian government, and how does that happen with Russia there shoring her up? For me, that is the real question. Thus, we should see a change in Syria sometime soon. Just exactly how that happens is a mystery; except to say that Damascus "shall be a ruinous heap" (Isa. 17:1).
When you factor in Psalms 83:9 then the chapter seems to indicate that the fall of Damascus is the result of the 144,000, after the rapture. However, the Psalm does not say that the fall of Damascus is like that of Gideon, but that it is hoped to be like that of Gideon. Thus, the fall must come before the rapture as indicated by the chronological order of Isa. Chapters 17, 18, and 19. That is, Damascus falls (17) and then Russia attacks the U. S. (18) then the U. S. Civil war (19).
Thus, it appears that Russia blames the U. S. for the fall of Damascus. That is perhaps their reason for attacking the U. S, in Isa. 18.
Thus, what events would transpire causing the U. S. to attack Damascus and more appropriately stated, what could transpire for one of her protectorates to attack Damascus. Russia knows that to attack a protectorate is to attack the U. S. directly. So why attack the protectorate? They simply attack the U. S. when Damascus falls.
The only thing that makes sense is that a treaty violation causes Israel to respond.
For me it is easy to see the chiasmus in the chapter. The center is Verse 9 and like I said it appears to be a request. The first parallel seems to break at Verse 83:12 and correspondingly at Verse 83:3. Thus the first parallel appears to be Verses 83:10-12 to Verses 83:3-8. This leaves for the second parallel Verses 83:1-2 to 83:13-18.
Thus, the ones that hate Lord Jesus have lifted up the head (83:2). The head is the beast of Rev. Chapter 13; thus, in my opinion Psalms 83 is more so about the crushing defeat of the beast after his 3.5 year reign.
I did not know that until just now as I worked it through. So in my opinion Psalms 83 is not about the fall of Damascus but the destruction of the beast after his 3.5 year reign.
Having said that, the fact remains that Damascus falls first.
|
|
|
Post by yardstick on Nov 27, 2017 11:21:53 GMT -6
Damascus is a hard subject for me. Her fall has already taken place; however, to be completely fallen is for the government to be destroyed. Thus, we are waiting for the fall of the Syrian government, and how does that happen with Russia there shoring her up? For me, that is the real question. Thus, we should see a change in Syria sometime soon. Just exactly how that happens is a mystery; except to say that Damascus "shall be a ruinous heap" (Isa. 17:1). When you factor in Psalms 83:9 then the chapter seems to indicate that the fall of Damascus is the result of the 144,000, after the rapture. However, the Psalm does not say that the fall of Damascus is like that of Gideon, but that it is hoped to be like that of Gideon. Thus, the fall must come before the rapture as indicated by the chronological order of Isa. Chapters 17, 18, and 19. That is, Damascus falls (17) and then Russia attacks the U. S. (18) then the U. S. Civil war (19). Thus, it appears that Russia blames the U. S. for the fall of Damascus. That is perhaps their reason for attacking the U. S, in Isa. 18. Thus, what events would transpire causing the U. S. to attack Damascus and more appropriately stated, what could transpire for one of her protectorates to attack Damascus. Russia knows that to attack a protectorate is to attack the U. S. directly. So why attack the protectorate? They simply attack the U. S. when Damascus falls. The only thing that makes sense is that a treaty violation causes Israel to respond. For me it is easy to see the chiasmus in the chapter. The center is Verse 9 and like I said it appears to be a request. The first parallel seems to break at Verse 83:12 and correspondingly at Verse 83:3. Thus the first parallel appears to be Verses 83:10-12 to Verses 83:3-8. This leaves for the second parallel Verses 83:1-2 to 83:13-18. Thus, the ones that hate Lord Jesus have lifted up the head (83:2). The head is the beast of Rev. Chapter 13; thus, in my opinion Psalms 83 is more so about the crushing defeat of the beast after his 3.5 year reign. I did not know that until just now as I worked it through. So in my opinion Psalms 83 is not about the fall of Damascus but the destruction of the beast after his 3.5 year reign. Having said that, the fact remains that Damascus falls first. Which of the areas below does the beast come from? Jordan Gaza Strip Lebanon Turkey
|
|
|
Post by boraddict on Nov 27, 2017 22:03:01 GMT -6
Which of the areas below does the beast come from?
Jordan
Gaza Strip
Lebanon
Turkey
Jordan is out because it is in line with the allied west.
Gaza is out because it holds little world power.
Lebanon is in; however, like Gaza it holds little influence on the world stage.
Thus, my vote is for Turkey. It is perfectly situated to act in the name of the European powers including Russia.
Post Script: It is interesting that Turkey is where the C. church began. That is, correct me if I am wrong; but, did not the C church begin under Constantine, in Constantinople. How interesting is that? Have we come full circle? I remember parts of a dream that I had years ago that finance was stabilized in Turkey under the direction of the Pope. Wow! I had already summarized that Francis was our man because of the 666 thing; however, I had no idea that he came out of Turkey. I could be way off on this; however, since that man is the one who calls out the beast. Thus, the beast would logically come out of Turkey.
It makes perfect sense. To me at least. Thus, it seems that Turkey who was once our quasi friend but now has capitulated towards Russia becomes the instrument of the beast. Thus, the beast arises in Turkey. That does not necessarily mean that the beast is from Turkey, but he arises upon the world scene from there.
I had no idea that Turkey played this major role. I guess now we should watch for Francis warming up to Turkey and whoever becomes his contact there. They will be two anti-Christs in a pod. You know, two peas in a pod.
|
|
|
Post by yardstick on Nov 28, 2017 10:58:46 GMT -6
Which of the areas below does the beast come from? Jordan Gaza Strip Lebanon Turkey Jordan is out because it is in line with the allied west. Gaza is out because it holds little world power. Lebanon is in; however, like Gaza it holds little influence on the world stage. Thus, my vote is for Turkey. It is perfectly situated to act in the name of the European powers including Russia. Post Script: It is interesting that Turkey is where the C. church began. That is, correct me if I am wrong; but, did not the C church begin under Constantine, in Constantinople. How interesting is that? Have we come full circle? I remember parts of a dream that I had years ago that finance was stabilized in Turkey under the direction of the Pope. Wow! I had already summarized that Francis was our man because of the 666 thing; however, I had no idea that he came out of Turkey. I could be way off on this; however, since that man is the one who calls out the beast. Thus, the beast would logically come out of Turkey. It makes perfect sense. To me at least. Thus, it seems that Turkey who was once our quasi friend but now has capitulated towards Russia becomes the instrument of the beast. Thus, the beast arises in Turkey. That does not necessarily mean that the beast is from Turkey, but he arises upon the world scene from there. I had no idea that Turkey played this major role. I guess now we should watch for Francis warming up to Turkey and whoever becomes his contact there. They will be two anti-Christs in a pod. You know, two peas in a pod. Not sure what you mean by Francis coming out of Turkey. A cursory investigation indicates that it appears he was born and spent most of his life in Buenos Aires, Argentina: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_FrancisIt also appears that his family background is northern Italian (from the same article). The sources appear to be well documented: Can you please explain in greater detail? Also, I am curious about a couple other things: 1. The relevance of a nation's world power in terms of it's likelihood of 'spawning' the Anti-Christ (beast) - that is, what is the biblical basis for drawing the conclusion that a nation must be a world-power or have great global influence to qualify as the potential nation from which the AC may rise? 2. How is Jordan 'in line with the allied west'? What does this phrase mean? Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
Post by yardstick on Nov 28, 2017 11:12:59 GMT -6
Damascus is a hard subject for me. Her fall has already taken place; however, to be completely fallen is for the government to be destroyed. Thus, we are waiting for the fall of the Syrian government, and how does that happen with Russia there shoring her up? For me, that is the real question. Thus, we should see a change in Syria sometime soon. Just exactly how that happens is a mystery; except to say that Damascus "shall be a ruinous heap" (Isa. 17:1)... Are you referring to conquest, decline, or complete destruction of the physical city?
|
|
|
Post by mike on Nov 28, 2017 12:34:24 GMT -6
Damascus is a hard subject for me. Her fall has already taken place; however, to be completely fallen is for the government to be destroyed. Thus, we are waiting for the fall of the Syrian government, and how does that happen with Russia there shoring her up? For me, that is the real question. Thus, we should see a change in Syria sometime soon. Just exactly how that happens is a mystery; except to say that Damascus "shall be a ruinous heap" (Isa. 17:1)... Are you referring to conquest, decline, or complete destruction of the physical city? Isaiah 17:1 " The burden of Damascus. Behold, Damascus is taken away from being a city, and it shall be a ruinous heap" Although (Personally) I had largely held that the city would be completely leveled, that is physically demolished, this Bible hub commentary indicates this likely already has happened
|
|
|
Post by dennislwatson on Nov 28, 2017 12:50:35 GMT -6
Damascus is a hard subject for me. Her fall has already taken place; however, to be completely fallen is for the government to be destroyed. Thus, we are waiting for the fall of the Syrian government, and how does that happen with Russia there shoring her up? For me, that is the real question. Thus, we should see a change in Syria sometime soon. Just exactly how that happens is a mystery; except to say that Damascus "shall be a ruinous heap" (Isa. 17:1)... Are you referring to conquest, decline, or complete destruction of the physical city? Isaiah 17 I believe, after listening to Christian commentators on the world's condition, and those every once in a while military rumors, about weapons having been buried throughout the city, and the end product of Isaiah 17 which suggests it is so destroyed it is no longer inhabitable, I am thinking we are anticipating perhaps Israel's use of new and horrendously powerful weapons that we may not quite know of yet. The weapon has to be powerful enough to destroy underground bunkers on a huge scale AND not cause deadly fallout to the nation to the west. Think scalar, think directed energy, (thanks 9/11) we don't even know what has been cooked up in the last 50 years, but Isaiah 17 will be fulfilled and shortly and it is hard to think that destruction will bring God glory but His Word says it and so we wait for the "hammer." May God's Word remain true.
|
|
|
Post by yardstick on Nov 28, 2017 14:40:47 GMT -6
Are you referring to conquest, decline, or complete destruction of the physical city? Isaiah 17:1 " The burden of Damascus. Behold, Damascus is taken away from being a city, and it shall be a ruinous heap" Although (Personally) I had largely held that the city would be completely leveled, that is physically demolished, this Bible hub commentary indicates this likely already has happened Cross-referencing the commentary information with Tiglath-pileser (III) seems to indicate that the Assyrians did not destroy the city, they only subjugated it. The fact that it remains as of this day as a city, would seem to indicate that this passage has not yet been fulfilled, or that there may be multiple fulfilments. Does someone have some linguistic observations about the phrase 'taken away from being a city' to indicate whether there is a sense of perpetuity? Clark's commentary seems to indicate it will be a ruin biblehub.com/niv/isaiah/17-1.htm
|
|
|
Post by boraddict on Nov 28, 2017 23:31:19 GMT -6
Which of the areas below does the beast come from? Jordan Gaza Strip Lebanon Turkey Jordan is out because it is in line with the allied west. Gaza is out because it holds little world power. Lebanon is in; however, like Gaza it holds little influence on the world stage. Thus, my vote is for Turkey. It is perfectly situated to act in the name of the European powers including Russia. Post Script: It is interesting that Turkey is where the C. church began. That is, correct me if I am wrong; but, did not the C church begin under Constantine, in Constantinople. How interesting is that? Have we come full circle? I remember parts of a dream that I had years ago that finance was stabilized in Turkey under the direction of the Pope. Wow! I had already summarized that Francis was our man because of the 666 thing; however, I had no idea that he came out of Turkey. I could be way off on this; however, since that man is the one who calls out the beast. Thus, the beast would logically come out of Turkey. It makes perfect sense. To me at least. Thus, it seems that Turkey who was once our quasi friend but now has capitulated towards Russia becomes the instrument of the beast. Thus, the beast arises in Turkey. That does not necessarily mean that the beast is from Turkey, but he arises upon the world scene from there. I had no idea that Turkey played this major role. I guess now we should watch for Francis warming up to Turkey and whoever becomes his contact there. They will be two anti-Christs in a pod. You know, two peas in a pod. Not sure what you mean by Francis coming out of Turkey. A cursory investigation indicates that it appears he was born and spent most of his life in Buenos Aires, Argentina: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_FrancisIt also appears that his family background is northern Italian (from the same article). The sources appear to be well documented: Can you please explain in greater detail? Also, I am curious about a couple other things: 1. The relevance of a nation's world power in terms of it's likelihood of 'spawning' the Anti-Christ (beast) - that is, what is the biblical basis for drawing the conclusion that a nation must be a world-power or have great global influence to qualify as the potential nation from which the AC may rise? 2. How is Jordan 'in line with the allied west'? What does this phrase mean? Thanks in advance. The following is from my own analysis and therefore my personal opinion. To answer your questions I must first establish the five fallen kings of Rev. 17:10. These are more correctly referenced as fallen kingdoms from the previous verse, Rev. 17:9. That is, the seven heads (of governments) are seven mountains (kingdoms). The fact that the woman sits upon all seven is beside the point and merely shows that the woman does not sit upon the eighth kingdom in Rev. 17:11. Thus, there are at the time of the rise of the beast in Rev. 13:1, seven fallen kingdoms. However, for my point here I am establishing the first five fallen kingdoms and these are given in Dan. Chapter 2. And they are: Babylon, Persia, Greece, Rome, and the nations of the world. This becomes easier to see when the Book of Daniel is understood to be the Book of Judah in Captivity. Thus, Judah is captured in Chapter 1, and freed in Chapter 12. Thus, you can see that Chapters 1 and 12 are the last parallel in the Book of Daniel chiasmus. Of the five fallen kingdoms, Judah was captured by Babylon who was conquered by Persia, who was conquered by Greece, who was conquered by Rome, and from there Judah was captive in the nations of the world. The sixth kingdom to preside over Judah was the United Nations and as you know this governmental body gave Judah her homeland back in 1948. Thus, the United Nations "is" kingdom number six in Rev. 17:10. Interestingly, this kingdom is a major player in the rise of the seventh kingdom and this is addressed in Dan. Chapter 7. "I considered the horns, and, behold, there came up among them another little horn" (Dan. 7:8). That is, I considered the sixth kingdom, the United Nations, and there came up among them another little government. This little government claims to have "eyes." That is, this little government can only see as a man sees and not as a prophet sees. Thus this little horn is a false prophet. In Rev. Chapter 13, this false prophet (Rev. 13:11) brings forth the Verse 13:1 beast. That is, he causes the world to worship the image of the beast. Again; he causes the world to worship the beast (2) of the beast (1). That is, beast 1 is in Rev. 17:3 and beast (2) is in Verse 13:1. Beast 1, the false prophet (Rev. 17:3), causes the rise of beast 2 (Rev. 13:1). This information is given in the angel's explanation, Rev. 17:7-18. The false prophet is shown to us in the Rev. 13:18 riddle. Since the false prophet claims to be the leader of Christ's church then we must begin with 400. However, since he is a false prophet then 400 must be subtracted from 666 leaving 266 and this is the number of Pope Francis according to the Catholic church. The question then is how does Francis cause the rise of the beast. It was my summation that he becomes involved in finance and more particularly the finance of Turkey, and as an outgrowth of that work that he causes the rise of the beast. Thus, Francis rises as the seventh kingdom beast as a result of his work in Turkey. Immediately afterwards he causes the rise of the eighth kingdom beast. That is what I meant when I said "he came out of Turkey." In order for Francis to cause the rise of the beast he must reorganize the United Nations. He does this by destroying three major players and again this is in Dan. Chapter 7. These three kingdoms are: Great Britain (Dan. 7:4), Germany (Dan. 7:6), and Russia (Dan. 7:5). Francis uses the power of Russia to cause the rise of the beast (Dan. 7:7), Russia. Thus, one of its heads was wounded to death and yet lived (Rev. 13:3). The larger question is who is this person that coordinates with Francis in Turkey to overthrow the current Russian Government. With regard to Jordan, they had their bombers attacking ISIS along side the U. S. and other allied nations. I do not know the extent of their participation but they are not on the side of Iran and Russia.
|
|
|
Post by boraddict on Nov 28, 2017 23:57:59 GMT -6
Damascus is a hard subject for me. Her fall has already taken place; however, to be completely fallen is for the government to be destroyed. Thus, we are waiting for the fall of the Syrian government, and how does that happen with Russia there shoring her up? For me, that is the real question. Thus, we should see a change in Syria sometime soon. Just exactly how that happens is a mystery; except to say that Damascus "shall be a ruinous heap" (Isa. 17:1)... Are you referring to conquest, decline, or complete destruction of the physical city? Yes, I am referring to the conquest and decline of Syria. The question in my mind at this point is the application of Psalms 83. If Damascus is not destroyed at the beginning of the tribulation then it must be the case that the 144,000 destroy this city when they come on the scene 3.5 years into the tribulation. I was discussing a similar point to my children this evening; that the first 3.5 years are the tribulation and the second 3.5 years are the judgment; although, all seven years are commonly called the tribulation. I can see it now. We are on the edge of this thing. It is ready to go. Stay close to Lord Jesus.
|
|
|
Post by yardstick on Nov 29, 2017 0:18:25 GMT -6
Are you referring to conquest, decline, or complete destruction of the physical city? Yes, I am referring to the conquest and decline of Syria. The question in my mind at this point is the application of Psalms 83. If Damascus is not destroyed at the beginning of the tribulation then it must be the case that the 144,000 destroy this city when they come on the scene 3.5 years into the tribulation. I was discussing a similar point to my children this evening; that the first 3.5 years are the tribulation and the second 3.5 years are the judgment; although, all seven years are commonly called the tribulation. I can see it now. We are on the edge of this thing. It is ready to go. Stay close to Lord Jesus. Can you clarify the information about the 144,000, please? I see two references in Revelation for them: Rev 7:1-8 and Rev 14:1-5. Ch 7 clearly shows the sealing of the 144,000 (12,000 from each of 12 tribes of Israel); and Ch 14 clearly shows (vs 1) the second coming, where Christ is standing on the Mount Zion, with the 144,000 around him. I cannot find any other scriptural references to the group referred to in these two passages. Verse 1 of Chapter 14, which describes Jesus on Mount Zion, appears to clearly show the second coming after He has arrived. This is well established as occurring at the end of the Great Tribulation (the end of the last 3-1/2 years of the Tribulation) from a premillennial viewpoint. Although I cannot find any specific reference in the above passages to what the 144,000 actually do, it is a commonly held belief that they are witnesses during the tribulation. What passages of scripture clearly show them as warriors?
|
|
|
Post by boraddict on Nov 29, 2017 0:49:27 GMT -6
You must be a scientist. Say perhaps a chemistry teacher. Why are your questions so hard to answer?
Rev. 17:14, "These (those with the beast) shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them: for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings: and they that are with him are called, and chosen, and faithful."
Rev. 14:1, "And I looked and lo, a Lamb stood on the mount Sion, and with him an hundred forty and four thousand, having his Father's name written in their foreheads."
Rev. 19:19, "And I saw the beast and the kings of the earth, and their armies, gathered together to make war against him that sat on the horse, and against his army.
Thus, the army of God is the 144,000.
Also, in speaking of the beast, Rev. 13:10 states, "He (the beast) that leadeth into captivity shall go into captivity: he (the beast) that killeth with the sward must be killed with the sward...." The beast is put into captivity in Rev. 19:20 and the remnant of the beast's army is slain with the sward in Rev. 19:21. The key is in the metaphors.
|
|
|
Post by mike on Nov 29, 2017 8:40:25 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by cwood85 on Nov 29, 2017 9:22:56 GMT -6
Lol mike! I was just thinking that after reading about @yardsticks questions being hard, that yep he sure makes you think and pick your brain! Thanks yardstick for making our brains smoke a bit
|
|