Ok. I have a question. I'm a new believer (January 14, 2017 Baby!) and I'm also new to this site so I may not know the correct way to do this. Please forgive me in advance if I do it wrong
Part of the reason I found Jesus was because of fulfilled prophecy. So I was happy
disciple4life started this thread. Cause, from what I've learned about the Daniel 9 prophecy there are many different interpretations. I've seen some people say it was fully fulfilled during the time of Christ and perhaps 3.5 years after his death was the end of the 70th week. Then others say the whole week is set to come and there was a gap. Then others say that half of the 70th week is left and it was also separated by a gap from the first part. There are also at least 4 different dates that can be used to start the 70 weeks altogether. Then there is the issue of whether to use 360 day years or 365.25 day years.
So now I am babbling on and on. I think my point is that I do think understanding this passage is important but I also think it is really hard to have proof one way or the other. If the timing is related to Jesus' crucifixion and also used as many to relate to the tribulation as Daniels 70th week it seems really important to figure this stuff out. But after centuries of nobody coming up with a provable case don't we have to wait for revelation like
homewardbound said? I mean, why are people so adamant that they know these things based on what they have figured out. Even the "proofs" that Jesus didn't die on a Friday can be seen in different ways than people insist they must be seen.
It seems that homewardbound brought up some really good points that this thread might be ignoring. So because of how important this passage is, I also found a different thread with interesting thoughts:
unsealed.boards.net/post/7246/thread. Here is someone (silentknight) who talks about revelation from God about the exact time of Jesus' death. In that thread, this thread, and other threads, various people reject what silentknight wrote based on what those other people think are contradictions or bad motives or something, but the reasons they give to reject what silentknight wrote is their own "understanding" of how it contradicts scripture and in some cases they seem kinda of rude about it.
So here I finally get to my really long winded question: I am not attacking anyone in asking, just trying to genuinely understand. Why do we put more stock in:
- our own understanding of some passages of scripture - often explained to us from other sources
- our own understanding of history, totally provided by other people
- some odd belief in what is written in the Talmud by unbelievers
than we put in a believer telling us an incredible story of how God revealed the exact time of of Jesus' death. I mean, did any of you actually read and understand how amazing the silentknight's story was? Do you all know something about him that I don't know on why he can't be trusted? The circumstance of the story seemed to come with their own proof! The odds of what he says happened are just amazing! So maybe you guys know that he can't be trusted or something. But to trust the writings of the Talmud or your personal interpretation of scripture and just dismiss what silentknight says he heard from God is very confusing to me. And that brings us back to what homewardbound said - even if someone heard from God when Jesus died, we would not believe it because we simply know better. It's like his words are being proven true already.
Being a new believer - i don't know what to believe and so I need help sorting all this out. Maybe silentknight was kicked off the site and that is why he his gone and being ignored by others. No evidence I have seen presented against what he heard can be considered indisputable. But we area saying what he heard was not true? How do we know? How are we able to discern what is from God and what is not?
Now, I can assume someone might answer this with their proof that their interpretation is correct - but that would just be arrogant based on the fact that they can't know - they can only speculate. I mean, wouldn't they be saying, "My understanding is better than God's and better than silentknights ability to hear God?" If the timing of Jesus' death was obvious we wouldn't need a thread to discuss it - so it clearly is not obvious enough to override the word of God in a brother's life, is it?
Please help me understand
Hello Cage, So glad to meet you, my brother, and so happy that you joined the forum, and man - I love your honesty. I can't speak for others but these kinds of straight, sincere, honest questions are fantastic, and I'm happy to have them on any/all the threads I start. From my conversations, I think others agree as well. ;-)
For anyone who has read more than 3 of my posts on any thread, I've said that we all are watchmen and women, sharing what we have learned, and all of us only have parts of the puzzle. No one has the monopoly on End times wisdom or knows all the answers.
So for starters - some of your questions, bro - I just don't know. The Daniel stuff- I'm studying- I'm learning, I'm reading and as I learn more, it means I have to change my views when I see the holes and flaws.
*** Now some really important points that are important to address - clarify. I know Silentknight, I love and respect him, and we hold many common views and we've talked back and forth on private messages as well. I don't know why he's not here.
- I don't think a single person on this forum, or any thread that thinks he had bad motives, or is a false prophet or couldn't be trusted.
- I don't know anyone is ignoring him - if he is no longer a member, he can't respond or even reply to questions or message, as I understand.
- I have also shared the words of end-times pastor Steve Ciocciolanti, that his former pastor didn't get everything right on end times, but that doesn't make him a false teacher, and we need to have the same kind of love and grace. ;-) We can share why we believe a viewpoint, or why we think a person is mistaken, but we're not unChristianizing anyone, or saying they're a false prophet.
Cage' post here- 'So here I finally get to my really long winded question: I am not attacking anyone in asking, just trying to genuinely understand.
Why do we put more stock in:
•our own understanding of some passages of scripture - often explained to us from other sources
•our own understanding of history, totally provided by other people
•some odd belief in what is written in the Talmud by unbelievers
than we put in a believer telling us an incredible story of how God revealed the exact time of of Jesus' death. I mean, did any of you actually read and understand how amazing the silentknight's story was?
Before I address this great question - I would like to first use two examples, that I think will make sense. ;-)
1. Tens of thousands of Christians have been led to believe that there is no rapture. Period. Not Before the Tribulation, not Mid-Tribulation, and not Post. One reason is that people are amillennialists - they believe all the passages in 16 books of the Bible that we use from Daniel, the Gospels and I and II Thessalonians, and Revelations, etc, are all symbolic. Are these people my brothers in Christ? YES!! Most are evangelicals who affirm the Apostles Creed, and all the major 'core doctrines' of scripture.
Countless others believe in the millennium, but that the concept of rapture is not Biblical - Their argument is that the word Rapture is not in the Bible. ** Neither is Bible, or Trinity. A brand new believer can use an interlinear Greek/English Bible that shows the exact lines of Greek text over the English lines, and a Strong's concordance that shows the definition of the Greek word "Harpazo - to snatch, or catch up quickly by force.
- It's not my own understanding of some passages of scripture that confirms the rapture.
- It's not my own understanding of history, or my own understanding of Greek,
- It's not my personal belief in the Talmud, written by unbelievers. It's the combination of harmonizing scripture about the resurrection, it's using common study tools widely available for free, and it's countless commentaries, and church fathers and historians, that cause many to see that the doctrine of a physical rapture is explicitly clear in scripture.
2. Let's use the example that some people on this forum, believe that the key to End Times, - rapture, second coming, tribulation events, - lies in the Egyptian pyramids.
-Are these people false prophets, NO. Do they have bad motives ?? NO. Are they brothers in Christ looking for the same rapture by Christ? YES !!! Can I learn something from them. YES??? Could they be misguided on some points? YES.
-We know from the Old Testament that idolatry was clearly condemned and punishable by stoning.
- We also know from the Old Testament, that sorcery/ occult practice was condemned and punishable by stoning.
- We also know that Astrology is a perversion of astronomy that God created, and that God is the creator of the Sun, moon, and stars for signs and seasons.
- We also know from multiple historians and multiple Christian commentaries that the plagues in Egypt were direct parallels to the things that the Egyptians literally worshiped.
- We also know from scripture that Paul said that the Feasts are a shadow of (point to) things to come.
- We also know from scripture that Paul said in Romans the Gospel was revealed to the Gentiles to provoke the Jews to jealousy.
- Paul also condemned the Christians for their pagan practices in Corinth - a Godless city of sexual immorality with temples and idols.
- We know from secular historians that Egyptians practiced human sacrifices of babies and offered them to the crocodiles in the Nile.
So would God use something that He condemned, and explicitly commanded that those who practiced would be stoned - as the keys to the End Times. We can say categorically no. *******************************************
OK, so now to SilentKnight. I'm not guessing or suggesting or implying that he has bad motives. ;-) I love and respect him as a brother and we agree on most things.
Like another poster/ fellow watchman said, I am not doubting he had a very meaningful and real dream.
I'm not suggesting or implying that that dream was from Satan.
When ever anyone has a dream - We need to always keep in mind some very important things.
1. God does speak to people in dreams and visions, but the primary way is still through his word-- Scripture.
2. God will never tell anyone something that goes against scripture.
3. Many times a dream is just a dream, - it's your mind playing, nothing more, -- no meaning, no warning, nothing prophetic, just pink ducks, or talking marshmallows.
4. We need to test everything - through the filter of God's word - We don't interpret scripture through our experiences or dreams, but we interpret our dreams through the lens of scripture.
5. We never build doctrine or theology on the Talmud or any other writings, or archaeology, but if you read the first opening thread about hostile witnesses, secular archaeologists and secular historians have confirmed or corroborated what is in scripture. Even atheist anti-god scientists have given testimony that supports Biblical creation and in the case of the Talmud, the Jews are indeed hostile to the Gospel / To Christians but their hostile witness, confirms a historical event, and it in no way benefits Judaism - in fact, their testimony underscores their own blindness-- how the Temple veil was torn, and the sacrifices were altered or affected, for 40 years up until the Temple was destroyed in 70 AD.
I hope this helps clarify a bit, @cage - but I really appreciate your honesty, and your candor. I don't have all the answers, - I'm trying my best to be a Berean and rightly divide the word of truth the best I can, and be faithful to what He has called me to do. ;-)
Here's a really great resource, Cage - www.gotquestions.org/Christian-dream-interpretation.html
Keep studying, and praying, Cage, and asking good questions, Cage, and weigh it through scripture, and the counsel, insight of others.
"Always be ready to give an answer for the hope that you have within you."
Maranatha, my brothers and sisters, Come quickly, Lord Jesus.