Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 10, 2017 11:37:30 GMT -6
I watched a video where the guy argued for the tribulation being like 22 years long... this stuff is confusing. Why is there such a difference of opinion?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 10, 2017 14:09:56 GMT -6
Hello on this blog, willt86!
I'd say maybe...'not reading their Bible'? That reduces the options considerably... I had someone argue with me about Daniel 9 and the 490 years. They wanted the one week to mean something different than the other 69 weeks. When I said "if a week=7 years in one part of a sentence, then "a week" can't mean something different in the rest of the same sentence?!" She just closed her Bible and said that she'd have to study it in her Jewish Bible. Many people see what they want but have not been given "sight to understand". Mainly because they WANT it to read something else. Kind of like Jesus being Israel's messiah and king and the people not wanting to see it.
|
|
|
Post by Gary on Mar 10, 2017 20:50:19 GMT -6
Hey Will, that's a great question and I want to second what truthseeker says. She's exactly right. For starters, I would encourage you to read this post I wrote about prophetic discernment. It describes a generally applicable Scriptural rule based on 1 Peter 1:20 and also 2 Corinthians 13:1, which says that as a general rule of thumb, if you hear someone suggest an interpretation of Scripture, but there isn't anyone else to back them up, ignore them. This is so, so important these days because when you start 'Googling' or searching on YouTube you'll find hundreds and hundreds of unique interpretations of the rapture, the tribulation, and all of prophecy for that matter. The Bible is crystal clear that Scriptural truth is not of private interpretation and it is also crystal clear that everything must be established by two or three witnesses. The standard seven-year Tribulation theory is widely recognized and Scripturally-defended by Pre-, Mid-, and Post-Trib premillennialists, alike. That's what I stick to. Daniel 9 seems pretty unambiguous to me: 69 "weeks" of years transpired from the decree to rebuild Jerusalem (445 or 444 BC) until the Messiah was cut off (probably 33 AD). That leaves exactly one week of years left (seven years) yet to be fulfilled and sure enough, Daniel 9:27 tells us that the antichrist will confirm a covenant for "one seven". It's a perfect fit. Plus the numerous mentions of day counts in Daniel and Revelation seem to line up pretty well with a roughly seven year period of time divided into two halves: 1260 days and 1260/1290/1335 days. Now, there are certainly those that try to squeeze Christ into this passage by saying He is the one that confirmed a seven-year covenant, and the 3.5 years described therein was His 3.5 year ministry. However, I don't buy this. Jesus never made a seven year covenant. His covenant is explicitly described as "eternal" (see Hebrews 13:20). In fact, there is nothing in the entire New Testament that could be even remotely described as a seven year period of time related to Christ's life - certainly not any kind of covenant.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 12, 2017 19:23:47 GMT -6
willt86, you bring up a good question. I find myself in agreement with truthseeker and Gary on this. The Holy Spirit leads the body of Christ into all truth, but there are those who want to isolate from the body and still think God will reveal truth to them and their theories are wack and nonsense. Prophecy teachers are in pretty good agreement on the trib period.
|
|