Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2017 22:45:08 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by mike on Sept 7, 2017 10:28:32 GMT -6
I read this and didnt get the impression she quite held the view we do about the sign. did i read it wrong? |
|
|
|
Post by MissusMack08 on Sept 7, 2017 10:51:13 GMT -6
I read this and didnt get the impression she quite held the view we do about the sign. did i read it wrong? I just read it. Essentially she makes the case that the woman clothed in the sun with the moon under her feet is Israel and the child born is the "mystical Christ" composed of Christ, the head, and the church, His body. She doesn't go further with any interpretation or speculation with any of the rest of the verses, which is, imo fine. She just covers the symbology of the Sign occurring in Rev 12:1-2, but she doesn't discuss the literal alignment. Edit: That's how I understood it, anyway. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 7, 2017 11:22:33 GMT -6
I read this and didnt get the impression she quite held the view we do about the sign. did i read it wrong? I just read it. Essentially she makes the case that the woman clothed in the sun with the moon under her feet is Israel and the child born is the "mystical Christ" composed of Christ, the head, and the church, His body. She doesn't go further with any interpretation or speculation with any of the rest of the verses, which is, imo fine. She just covers the symbology of the Sign occurring in Rev 12:1-2, but she doesn't discuss the literal alignment. Edit: That's how I understood it, anyway. That's my understanding, too! It's just the clarification of the symbols of Rev12. But I appreciate her laying the theological groundwork for the Rev12 sign. Maybe some articles on that are to follow soon.... It's very remarkable to read such a strong confirmation for the man-child including the church on RR. |
|
|
|
Post by Natalie on Sept 7, 2017 14:00:17 GMT -6
But as they would tell you on the bulletin board -- The articles are not tied to the bulletin board and so they don't always agree. They don't really allow much discussion of it.
I haven't been on RR lately as my computer keeps blocking me and it sets off my AVG virus stuff. Although I can access it on my phone which also has AVG.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 7, 2017 23:13:04 GMT -6
But as they would tell you on the bulletin board -- The articles are not tied to the bulletin board and so they don't always agree. They don't really allow much discussion of it. I haven't been on RR lately as my computer keeps blocking me and it sets off my AVG virus stuff. Although I can access it on my phone which also has AVG. I have never been on their BB, but I have yet heard of restrictions regarding special discussions.... I have been reading their featured articles since several years and my impression is, more and more featured writers at RR are getting the message of the convergence which of course includes the Rev 12 sign as well. RR's articles have a very far reaching influence, as far as I can see from here in Europe. Many people appreciate the balanced teaching of their authors. And I am sure, they are also part of our common body of Christ and do the job, God assigned to them. |
|
|
|
Post by Natalie on Sept 8, 2017 2:49:16 GMT -6
The bulletin board has locked the thread discussing Rev 12. They let it go for a bit which surprised me but then called it date setting and locked it. Further discussion always gets moved to the locked thread almost right away.
I agree with you about the articles on the main page.
|
|
