Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 1, 2019 9:31:23 GMT -6
bowman, the link I provided is the exact one I used to show the exact word is the same in the sentence, there was no deceit on my part whatsoever. That is the exact link I used....
As far as "plagiarize", I was not intending to claim credit for the definition as my own....I inserted it for illustration to show it was exactly the same, "ho" Strong's 3588 ...
"stole", "plagiarize", "deceit", "improper link" are false charges bowman
|
|
|
|
Post by mike on Jun 1, 2019 9:33:56 GMT -6
@sam bowman - please stop. I need to separate you two for a little. 😉 Seriously...speak as brothers. Brothers argue, and make up. It's ok to disagree but in a more loving manner. Bowman, I know Sam for nearly two years. If he plagiarized it was not intentional. Bring this his attention in love brother. Thanks |
|
|
|
Post by bowman on Jun 1, 2019 10:12:00 GMT -6
@sam bowman - please stop. I need to separate you two for a little. 😉 Seriously...speak as brothers. Brothers argue, and make up. It's ok to disagree but in a more loving manner. Bowman, I know Sam for nearly two years. If he plagiarized it was not intentional. Bring this his attention in love brother. Thanks
Thanks Mike....however, I know plaigarizm and deceit when I see it....it is what it is, and it is up to mods if they are willing to do anything about it, or not...  |
|
|
|
Post by yardstick on Jun 1, 2019 10:43:11 GMT -6
That’s not correct bowman, I took it from bible hub online: biblehub.com/interlinear/1_john/4-4.htmIf it violates any copyright, it was unintentional on my part. I did not “deceitfully” splice two different quotes together as you charge, the are exactly the same word as anyone can see at the link Have fun, I’m done Sam, It's never a bad idea to post the link to where you got your information from, if it isn't an original thought. |
|
|
|
Post by yardstick on Jun 1, 2019 10:50:03 GMT -6
bowman, you know who the plural is directed to by reading the 1st 3 verses... It is any spirit who is antichrist...that is the context! We have overcome them because greater is "He" (3588 "ho" corresponds to our definite article the (German der, die, das), which is properly a demonstrative pronoun) in us than "he" (3588 "ho" corresponds to our definite article the (German der, die, das), which is properly a demonstrative pronoun) that is in the world. "ho" in us, greater than "ho" in the world....which is why we overcome the spirits of antichrist, "them", as described in the first 3 verses...context dear bowman, context
Your reply plagiarizes Thayer's Greek Lexicon, which you googled from the web, without providing proper credit.
Further, you even went so far as to splice two completely different Thayer lexical quotes together, which were never even intended to be a continuous sentence in the first place!
Why do you feel the need to deceitfully plagiarize, and then tamper with that same plaigarization in order to somehow 'prove' a point?
Sad...
, (without intending to defend anyone) Although it would have been a good idea for sam to provide the link to the grammar, I am pretty sure there is no copyrighted materials infringed upon. Grammar is grammar, regardless of who you get the information from. Nevertheless (and despite sam not posting the link) it does not invalidate his grammatical point. If you believe he is grammatically mistaken, then you should also provide your supporting information in such a way as to indicate the correct grammar (I think you did this alread in a subsequent post, but I haven't got that far reading yet). I would point out that your complaint of plagiarizing as a counter-argument, is off point, and therefore ineffective as an argument. @sam and bowman If you two are going to debate, then do so by staying on point, and being polite about it. And that does not mean subtle snarkiness disguised as politeness either. State your point or position, and give support. Your best strategy is to present your thoughts, answer questions to the best of your ability, and let the 'court of public opinion' decide for themselves. Ask questions for clarification. These alone may be enough to see the holes in someone's argument or position. As has been said before on this forum, it isnt the job of Christians to try to convince people. Our job is to give the message of the good news. It is the Holy Spirit's job to convince people. That includes each other. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- @ the both of you: Remember the speck in the other guy's eye should never be considered to be greater than the plank in your own. |
|
|
|
Post by yardstick on Jun 1, 2019 11:39:00 GMT -6
Locked for review.
|
|
