Earthquakes - Non Literal comming judgments

Do you have a source or other Scripture to prove that what you say is true? I know that Israel is referenced as a female and considered a harlot by running after foreign gods (the book of Hosea), but where does it show that earthquakes weren't literal?  None of the verses you quoted sound figurative to me without reading meaning into them.  

I think it's an interesting thing to think of; however, I have no problem seeing it as a literal earthquake. And just upfront, I am assuming that I take Revelation more literally than you two do, but I'll consider that much may also have a figurative interpretation. Maybe it's both.

Right now there are volcanoes that were "sleeping" or "extinct" that are now waking up. What would happen if earthquakes and volcanoes around the world went off all at once? I'm not talking about little spews of ash, but major eruptions. Or the whole ring of fire at once? (not sure if that's possible, but with God if could be) Would it spew enough ash in the air to make the sun look like it was wearing sackcloth? the moon like blood? (I've seen wildfires do it) Would that not make the earth shake and totter? Sure, it could be spiritual, because, yes, it will be a period of great spiritual darkness, but I think it very well could also be literal. 

.

I always like to reference Matthew 24. The disciples had asked Jesus regarding the signs of the end of the age and His coming and Jesus gave them a list of signs that were literal, physical signs, including actual 'earthquakes in divers places". These events are to occur within the framework and timing the book of Revelation spans. So I would expect many of the calamities described in Revelation to fulfill the prophecy Jesus gave His disciples in Matthew. Earthquakes included.

Most of us in the pre-trib camp have always felt that when you begin to spiritualize too many scriptures, it becomes a slippery slope where everyone can interpret scripture according to their own particular bent.

I saw an excellent article regarding this recently...I'll try to find that...but the gist was, comparing denominations that spiritualize much of scripture compared to denominations that take a more literal interpretation. What was found regarding the prophetic scriptures is that the denominations that heavily spiritualize are all over the map. 10 denominations, 10 different interpretations. Whereas the vast majority of denominations that take the literal approach have astonishingly similar interpretations. And that's exactly what I would expect the Lord to expect of His church. That we rightly divide the word and largely agree on matters of doctrine, prophecy, etc. Unfortunately, that is not the case. The church is splintered.

But where does it stop? If you say God shaking the earth (through earthquakes) is not really what it means, mountains aren't really mountains, etc, soon you can spiritualize everything and get a whole different God and Bible. How do you know when to spiritualize things?

Did you read the article Fitz linked?

Obviously there are times when things aren't to be taken literally, but those things are explained within the text. For example, in Daniel he has the vision of the ram and the goat. It is explained to him what those represent. John sees things and is told what they are.