|
|
Post by boraddict on Jun 1, 2018 19:58:22 GMT -6
It is my contention that Lord Jesus was born in 3 BC and died in 27 AD. There are three primary legs to this proof which are the year of taxation by the Romans showing when Lord Jesus was born, Daniel's prophecy showing the year of 27 AD for the Savior's death, and the possible evidence found in the heavens.
|
|
|
|
Post by barbiosheepgirl on Jun 1, 2018 20:16:02 GMT -6
I watched the dvd Star of Bethleham...is this relevant to your findings? I think that author had found the conjunction Bethlehem Star but not at 3 bc..but I have to recheck...
|
|
|
|
Post by boraddict on Jun 1, 2018 21:52:27 GMT -6
I watched the dvd Star of Bethleham...is this relevant to your findings? I think that author had found the conjunction Bethlehem Star but not at 3 bc..but I have to recheck... Yes. The Star of Bethlehem would have been after the Savior was born. Perhaps when he was one or two years old. It is my understanding that Joseph and Mary lived in Bethlehem for a couple of years before they went to Egypt. |
|
|
|
Post by fitz on Jun 2, 2018 7:24:29 GMT -6
Yep, the Magi didn't come to the stable...it was probably 2 years later.
|
|
|
|
Post by boraddict on Jun 3, 2018 12:00:26 GMT -6
I was reading a post by brandon and wondered about the darkness when Lord Jesus died. It is possible that an eclipse occurred at the Savior's moment of death.
Interestingly, Ron Wyatt said that the Savior's blood went through a crack at the foot of the cross (caused by the earthquake) down onto the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant. I believe it was there in that cave, below the cross site, that Lord Jesus may have stayed (out of body) for three nights and three days.
|
|
|
|
Post by Natalie on Jun 3, 2018 12:08:48 GMT -6
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2018 13:10:53 GMT -6
I was reading a post by brandon and wondered about the darkness when Lord Jesus died. It is possible that an eclipse occurred at the Savior's moment of death. Interestingly, Ron Wyatt said that the Savior's blood went through a crack at the foot of the cross (caused by the earthquake) down onto the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant. I believe it was there in that cave, below the cross site, that Lord Jesus may have stayed (out of body) for three nights and three days. Just for the record and not to derail this thread: no "normal" eclipse can last 3 hours, as written in the gospel. Solar eclipses with our moon involved last only up to a few minutes. But it could have been an solar eclipse with an unknown body or planet. |
|
|
|
Post by boraddict on Jun 3, 2018 14:11:47 GMT -6
I was reading a post by brandon and wondered about the darkness when Lord Jesus died. It is possible that an eclipse occurred at the Savior's moment of death. Interestingly, Ron Wyatt said that the Savior's blood went through a crack at the foot of the cross (caused by the earthquake) down onto the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant. I believe it was there in that cave, below the cross site, that Lord Jesus may have stayed (out of body) for three nights and three days. Just for the record and not to derail this thread: no "normal" eclipse can last 3 hours, as written in the gospel. Solar eclipses with our moon involved last only up to a few minutes. But it could have been an solar eclipse with an unknown body or planet. Hi stephan. Please do not worry about derailing this thread because it is not derail-able; anything goes. Yes, you are right for a standard eclipse; it does last for only a few minutes. However, just as in the case of the sun standing still for Joshua (Joshua 10:12-14), the Lord could have caused the moon to block the sun in an eclipse for three hours. A number of years ago I worked on a theory that the sun could stay in one place in the sky if the earth's magnetic pole shifted from say, north to south by 90 degrees. You know, let the earth spin with Israel as the magnetic north pole. Thus, the sun would stand still for one specific location upon the earth. Also, there would be some massive earthquakes as a result. Thus, I believe the earth's magnetic north shifted when a solar eclipse occurred at the time of the Savior's death. This caused the eclipse to stay directly above Jerusalem for those three hours (Luke 23:44). However, if the entire earth was covered with darkness then that darkness might be metaphor for the glee of Satan and his followers who thought they were victorious over God. If the darkness over the earth is literal then perhaps another heavenly body such as planet X blocked the sun.  |
|
|
|
Post by boraddict on Jun 3, 2018 14:14:43 GMT -6
Thank you Natalie. I really could not envision Lord Jesus sitting like a recluse in a cave for three nights and three days. |
|
|
|
Post by venge on Jun 3, 2018 18:09:34 GMT -6
.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2018 22:54:52 GMT -6
boraddict , not sure if you were involved in some discussion last year regarding The Long Day of Joshua and similar topics. In this post there are some references to good reads on this if you are interested. unsealed.boards.net/post/7502/threadNo wild speculation but rocksolid stellar mechanics and full agreement with the biblical recorded events. I would strongly recommend reading The Long Day of Joshua written by Patten, Hatch and Steinhauer if you do not yet know this book. It is by far the best explanation of lots of catastrophic events, written and described in Isaiah, Joshua and many more. And it takes into account all known facts, physics, astronomy, written history records and of course the bible.
|
|
|
|
Post by galen on Aug 13, 2018 17:13:18 GMT -6
All I have read suggests that Jesus began his 3 year ministry at 30 so your suggested lifespan would be too short.
|
|
|
|
Post by boraddict on Aug 13, 2018 23:03:59 GMT -6
All I have read suggests that Jesus began his 3 year ministry at 30 so your suggested lifespan would be too short. It's like when you go a fishin and sooner or later they will bite. And here we are! Now I just need to real in the catch. Okay, so time went along until someone with the initials of AD decided to date time from his reign. He was a bad ruler so then comes a monk, a few hundred years later, and he decided to change the AD to mean something else. Later, he decided to place the birth of Our Lord as year 1 AD. This monk did not know the exact date of the Savior's birth, only that the year was 1 AD. It was then that everyone accepted 1 AD as the year of the Savior's birth. Then along comes the idea that 1 BC would be the first year before the birth of Christ; thus 1 "Before Christ." However, since Daniel's prophecy shows the year 27 AD, and the Savior was approx. 30 years old, then we must go back from 27 AD to 3 BC for the birth of Christ. That is, if that monk had understood Daniel's prophecy then he would have placed 1 AD as the correct year of the Savior's birth and our year now would be 2014 or 2015 instead of 2018. I will provide the details of this information when I have more time. Thanks for biting, I have been waiting a long time for this. |
|
|
|
Post by kjs on Sept 10, 2018 9:36:47 GMT -6
Then there is the group that says 28AD
My personal opinion is that any group that still claims a Friday Crucifixion is wrong.....
We know that Jesus is the "Lamb of God" which based on the Bible passage Exodus
says the Passover Lamb has to be selected on the TENTH (10th) of First Month AND Slain on the fourteenth (14th).....
Therefore if Christ was "selected on" Palm Sunday (ie 10th) then His Crucifixion had to happen on Thursday the 14th
Find the year when this combination occurred and you have the year..........
|
|
|
|
Post by venge on Sept 10, 2018 15:54:37 GMT -6
.
|
|
