|
Post by gregt on May 6, 2017 3:04:18 GMT -6
Something I have noticed with the few public names that have commented on the Rev. 12/Sept. 23 theory is that they did so because they were receiving a lot of inquiries about it. You have to believe this is true with big name dispensational preachers who teach on prophecy. Why will they not address this issue?
|
|
|
Post by gregt on May 6, 2017 5:47:48 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by watchmanjim on May 6, 2017 15:57:16 GMT -6
Answers in Genesis already came out with an article and officially poo-pooed the whole idea.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2017 18:11:51 GMT -6
Don't know if you saw but they addressed it on Unsealed.
|
|
|
Post by gregt on May 8, 2017 8:56:58 GMT -6
Would you happen to have a link?
|
|
|
Post by watchmanjim on May 8, 2017 19:35:48 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by gregt on May 8, 2017 19:59:41 GMT -6
Thanks Jim, I was referring to the article on Unsealed.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 9, 2017 8:40:19 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by gregt on May 9, 2017 11:56:43 GMT -6
Unfortunately, I believe the big names are outing themselves as John 10 hirelings. They could come forward and say "yes", or "no", or "I don't know, but let's be careful here", but they haven't taken any of these positions. I suspect "yes" or "no" is too risky for them, and to admit "I don't know" would damage their reputation as an authority on the Bible.
|
|
|
Post by brad on May 9, 2017 12:46:21 GMT -6
gregt... This sounds like wisdom to me! And also like the spiritual leaders of Jesus's time!
|
|