|
Post by krnboitae on Dec 21, 2017 19:24:21 GMT -6
I want to ask very simple question for everyone here.
Revelation 12 virgo sign was a woman clothed with a sun, moon under her feet, 12 stars above her head giving birth to Jupiter. If a woman gives a birth to a son and a daughter, (they are not twins.)
1. how long does it take for her blood to be purified to enter the most holy place called heaven?
Hint...Leviticus 12:1-5
All we need is blood of Jesus to enter the heaven but why did God tell us 33 and 66 days? For us to count/calculate
|
|
|
Post by mike on Dec 21, 2017 19:39:02 GMT -6
Where are getting a son and a daughter from? That is not what happened in the stars on 9/23, moreover scripture confirms child not children.
1 And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars: 2 And she being with child cried, travailing in birth, and pained to be delivered.
|
|
|
Post by krnboitae on Dec 21, 2017 19:40:08 GMT -6
Where are getting a son and a daughter from? That is not what happened in the stars on 9/23, moreover scripture confirms child not children. 1 And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars: 2 And she being with child cried, travailing in birth, and pained to be delivered. If jupiter is the church, church has male and female right? Head of the church = Jesus Body of Christ = church Col 1:18 And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the preeminence.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 21, 2017 19:40:31 GMT -6
krnboitae,
the verse referenced actually has 2 more weeks for a female and 1 more week for a male. total of 40 days for male and 80 for a female.
There is nothing in the passage that indicates what to do if twins are born. If two children are born at the same time, they are twins even if they have different genders.
Common sense, because the law does not state - is that the woman would remain unclean for the longest period of time determined for the genders born. So, if both are male, 40 days. if one or two are female - 80 days.
Taking only part of the cleansing period and then adding them together seems like the least acceptable way of calculating - well no, there is one more way that would be even less acceptable - to just make up whatever number of days one wishes.
----
You started your posting here with events that were occurring on each Sunday that pointed, by the nature of the events themselves to the 31st. Have you seen that pattern continue?
|
|
|
Post by krnboitae on Dec 21, 2017 19:46:53 GMT -6
krnboitae, the verse referenced actually has 2 more weeks for a female and 1 more week for a male. total of 40 days for male and 80 for a female. There is nothing in the passage that indicates what to do if twins are born. If two children are born at the same time, they are twins even if they have different genders. Common sense, because the law does not state - is that the woman would remain unclean for the longest period of time determined for the genders born. So, if both are male, 40 days. if one or two are female - 80 days. Taking only part of the cleansing period and then adding them together seems like the least acceptable way of calculating - well no, there is one more way that would be even less acceptable - to just make up whatever number of days one wishes. ---- You started your posting here with events that were occurring on each Sunday that pointed, by the nature of the events themselves to the 31st. Have you seen that pattern continue? Please separate... 1 week and 2 weeks from 33 and 66 days.... She is unlcean for 1 week for giving birth to a son and 2 weeks for giving birth to a daughter. Her blood is different. Her blood needs to be purified 33 days for a son and 66 days for a daighter. Yes there were many warnings just not able to update the thread its locked.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 21, 2017 19:52:01 GMT -6
1. Why do you choose to separate? The period of days is the 40 and 80, is it not? Or do you interpret that the 2 weeks is in parallel to the 66? 2. Then also, you did not deal with the other idea - that the time for two children would simply be the longest time required by law, not the addition of both times?
|
|
|
Post by krnboitae on Dec 21, 2017 19:55:24 GMT -6
1. Why do you choose to separate? The period of days is the 40 and 80, is it not? Or do you interpret that the 2 weeks is in parallel to the 66? 2. Then also, you did not deal with the other idea - that the time for two children would simply be the longest time required by law, not the addition of both times? Let me answer both question in once....I would say 1 week is already included in 33 days and 2 weeks is already included in 66 days.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 21, 2017 20:00:48 GMT -6
It seems that you consider that the 1 week is included in the 33 days - so you are saying that the week and the 33 days start at the same time and run concurrently.
If this is the case, then wouldn't it also make sense for the 33 days and the 66 days to start at the same time and run concurrently? Wouldn't that be an equally acceptable, or even more acceptable way of calculating for two children born at the same time?
|
|
|
Post by krnboitae on Dec 21, 2017 20:02:51 GMT -6
It seems that you consider that the 1 week is included in the 33 days - so you are saying that the week and the 33 days start at the same time and run concurrently. If this is the case, then wouldn't it also make sense for the 33 days and the 66 days to start at the same time and run concurrently? Wouldn't that be an equally acceptable, or even more acceptable way of calculating for two children born at the same time? If that was the case, we should have been raptured already!! only after 66 days. Please look at the event that happened too. This was like circumcision event for a son. 8 days later on 10/01/2017, Route 91 Harvest music festival shooting happened. Add 91 days to 10/01/2017, you get 12/31/2017. "91" route "HARVEST" music festival shooting (Security guard's name was "JESUS" Campos) on "PARADISE" avenue in "SIN CITY" Route: a way or course taken in getting from a starting point to a destination Lets make a sentence from above words. I can make below sentence. Jesus comes (sounds like campos?) to harvest for paradise and to judge the sinners in 91 days.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 21, 2017 20:13:19 GMT -6
It seems that you consider that the 1 week is included in the 33 days - so you are saying that the week and the 33 days start at the same time and run concurrently. If this is the case, then wouldn't it also make sense for the 33 days and the 66 days to start at the same time and run concurrently? Wouldn't that be an equally acceptable, or even more acceptable way of calculating for two children born at the same time? If that was the case, we should have been raptured already!! only after 66 days. Please look at the event that happened too. This was like circumcision event for a son. 8 days later on 10/01/2017, Route 91 Harvest music festival shooting happened. Add 91 days to 10/01/2017, you get 12/31/2017. "91" route "HARVEST" music festival shooting (Security guard's name was "JESUS" Campos) on "PARADISE" avenue in "SIN CITY" Route: a way or course taken in getting from a starting point to a destination Lets make a sentence from above words. I can make below sentence. Jesus comes (sounds like campos?) to harvest for paradise and to judge the sinners in 91 days. But, my friend, the question is - wouldn't that be a more acceptable way to calculate - and therefore, if we have not been raptured already, perhaps this law cannot be used for the calculation? Or, if this law is to be used, perhaps the start date was incorrect. And even more convincing - the child is the one being "raptured" not the woman. The woman was the one to remain in her impurity - not the child. There is nothing that stops the child from advancing to the throne on the 8th day - when he was to be presented. What if we came up with a different sentence? Like this - Paradise HARDEST to Camp on, SIN in 91 days. I think the challenge to be answered here is to explain how the woman's impurity stops the Child from reaching the throne?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 21, 2017 20:16:37 GMT -6
Also, krnboitae - now that you are on your own thread - I am more curious about hearing your testimony on how you heard God reveal this to you.
You mentioned before that God gave you this prophecy - I do not want to argue with the Word of God. Would you mind telling us, how that occured? I don't mean, how you figured it out from the news reports - I mean, how did God speak to you and reveal that 12/31/17 is the rapture?
If you don't want to, I understand, but that is more important to me than these impurity counts.
Thanks, brother.
|
|
|
Post by krnboitae on Dec 21, 2017 20:18:32 GMT -6
If that was the case, we should have been raptured already!! only after 66 days. Please look at the event that happened too. This was like circumcision event for a son. 8 days later on 10/01/2017, Route 91 Harvest music festival shooting happened. Add 91 days to 10/01/2017, you get 12/31/2017. "91" route "HARVEST" music festival shooting (Security guard's name was "JESUS" Campos) on "PARADISE" avenue in "SIN CITY" Route: a way or course taken in getting from a starting point to a destination Lets make a sentence from above words. I can make below sentence. Jesus comes (sounds like campos?) to harvest for paradise and to judge the sinners in 91 days. But, my friend, the question is - wouldn't that be a more acceptable way to calculate - and therefore, if we have not been rapture already, perhaps this law cannot be used for the calculation? Or, if this law is to be used, perhaps the start date was incorrect. And even more convincing - the child is the one being "raptured" not the woman. The woman was the one to remain in her impurity - not the child. There is nothing that stops the child from advancing to the throne on the 8th day - when he was to be presented. What if we came up with a different sentence? Like this - Paradise HARDEST to Camp on, SIN in 91 days. I think the challenge to be answered here it to explain how the woman's impurity stops the Child from reaching the throne? Circumsion is for a son not for a daughter. So we need to follow 33 days plus 66 days. If you read leviticus 12, she is not to touch anything holy until her blood is purified. So she cannot enter heaven until 99 days are over. If you make a sentence like that... I am sorry but can you use your common sense?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 21, 2017 20:20:34 GMT -6
But, my friend, the question is - wouldn't that be a more acceptable way to calculate - and therefore, if we have not been rapture already, perhaps this law cannot be used for the calculation? Or, if this law is to be used, perhaps the start date was incorrect. And even more convincing - the child is the one being "raptured" not the woman. The woman was the one to remain in her impurity - not the child. There is nothing that stops the child from advancing to the throne on the 8th day - when he was to be presented. What if we came up with a different sentence? Like this - Paradise HARDEST to Camp on, SIN in 91 days. I think the challenge to be answered here it to explain how the woman's impurity stops the Child from reaching the throne? Circumsion is for a son not for a daughter. So we need to follow 33 days plus 66 days. If you read leviticus 12, she is not to touch anything holy until her blood is purified. So she cannot enter heaven until 99 days are over. The women is impure - not the child. The child does not need to wait 33 or 66 days. The woman giving birth does - and in this case - the woman doesn't go to heaven. It is the child that is being raptured. Do you see that? The woman in rev 12 is not raptured. Do you see this differently?
|
|
|
Post by krnboitae on Dec 21, 2017 20:28:28 GMT -6
Church is male and female. We all have mothers. Mothers give birth and they are part of the church. Female child grows up and become a mother one day.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 21, 2017 20:32:26 GMT -6
Church is male and female. We all have mothers. Mothers give birth and they are part of the church. Female child grows up and become a mother one day. Thanks for taking the time to patiently answer my questions and explain your way of thinking about this. I do appreciate your gentleness in trying to help me understand. I'd still love to hear how God told you the rapture date - but from your experience of hearing him. Not from how you "figured" it out. If you would like to share that with me that would be nice. Otherwise, I understand. I am much more interested in your experience with hearing God. SK
|
|