|
|
Post by watchmanjim on Jun 30, 2017 23:32:03 GMT -6
I always took each 1,000 years to be an approximation. As an approximation, it all fits nicely, just like the approximations we see in the Rev. 12 sign. Some things in life are made to be extremely precise, others are the beauty of the approximate.
Rev. 20 says that after the 1,000 year reign, satan is loosed for a short while. How short? How many years, weeks, or minutes, do we add for that brief age of infamy? Is that beyond the 1,000 years, as the text seems to indicate, or part of it? Or is it all approximate? Or is the 1,000 years precise, but not every 1,000 years?
What if every one of the 1,000 years is bookended with a week of 7 years?
|
|
|
|
Post by whatif on Jun 30, 2017 23:49:41 GMT -6
Wow! Those are intriguing questions, watchmanjim! Now you've got me curious... Seven periods of 7 years would be an extra 49 years--almost a single jubilee... A fascinating thought...
|
|
|
|
Post by watchmanjim on Jul 1, 2017 0:01:08 GMT -6
Wow! Those are intriguing questions, watchmanjim! Now you've got me curious... Seven periods of 7 years would be an extra 49 years--almost a single jubilee... A fascinating thought... Eight 7's, Whatif. 8 7's and 7 1,000's. Just wondering. |
|
|
|
Post by whatif on Jul 1, 2017 0:07:01 GMT -6
Where's the 8th one come in, watchmanjim? I'm a mathematical nightmare of my own making!  |
|
|
|
Post by watchmanjim on Jul 1, 2017 0:14:47 GMT -6
7(1000)7(1000)7(1000)7(1000)7(1000)7(1000)7(1000)7
7(Adam)7(Enoch)7(Noah)7(David)7(Christ)7(William the Conqueror)7(Christ again)7
|
|
|
|
Post by whatif on Jul 1, 2017 1:09:56 GMT -6
Ahhh! I think I see! There is a 7 before the 1st 1000 because of the possibility that Adam and Eve were in the Garden of Eden 7 years before the fall, right?
|
|
|
|
Post by watchmanjim on Jul 1, 2017 1:21:58 GMT -6
Yes. And I put William the Conqueror, not because he was as special as the Bible people, but because he was a famous person alive around the beginning of the 6th 1,000 years.
|
|
|
|
Post by whatif on Jul 1, 2017 1:38:42 GMT -6
Makes sense to me! That's a very cool theory!
|
|
|
|
Post by watchmanjim on Jul 1, 2017 7:22:40 GMT -6
So let me stress, that's just a hunch I had based on everything else everybody was saying.
|
|
|
|
Post by kjs on Jul 2, 2017 14:17:01 GMT -6
Thanks for the video, he make a lot of sense getting to the 4th year of Solomon ....
But then he claims 966 years from Solomon to Jesus -- I got 987 or 983 depending how you count.
You have the 400 years of silence were no writings were recorded that is around 398bc. And Solomon dies in 975 bc ....
So he lost me at that point....
Now the 1948 from first Adam to Abraham And Jesus (2nd Adam) To restored Isarel as being 1948 was an interesting note... But that assumes Jesus was born in 1ad, and that date is kind of "iffy"
But had to shut the video down when he started his Rant, that one has to be "on fire", and one needs to get ready working hard for God .... In Oder not to be left behind.
No, No, No ..... It is all about what Jesus DID! Never about what you may or may not do.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 2, 2017 17:28:24 GMT -6
I could be interpreting this wrong, but on the 1st line of Chapter 4 of the Book of jubilees at www.pseudepigrapha.com/jubilees/4.htmit states "And in the third week in the second jubilee she gave birth to Cain, and in the fourth she gave birth to Abel, and in the fifth she gave birth to her daughter Âwân." The third week (depending on whether it's the start or end of the week) would be either 14 or 21 years into the second jubilee of 50 years, so I'm thinking creation (assuming that's when Adam & Eve were created) was 64 to 71 years earlier. If the last time the Revelation 12 sign came close to appearing like it will look this September, was in 3915 BC and if that was the date of creation, then adding 3915+2017 plus 64 to 71 equals 5,996 to 6,003. I'm inclined to go with 5,996 based on the start of the week and strangely enough, it ends up being about 3.5 years from the 6,000 year mark. |
|
|
|
Post by watchmanjim on Jul 2, 2017 18:52:28 GMT -6
Welcome, bloodredmoon!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 2, 2017 19:12:28 GMT -6
@ Beloved Two of your comments in the shoutbox really intrigued me. The first comment about the infrared Google Sky images being from 1980 is something I wasn't at all aware of and that's very important on its own, but now I'm obsessed with finding either a live infrared online telescope or if one exists and it's even possible, an infrared astronomy mobile app so I can see what's waiting to devour Jupiter as it exits Virgo. The second comment of yours that intrigued me was about IRAS surveying the night sky for the first time in 1983. I did a little sleuthing and found this very interesting 1983 article from the Washington Post... www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1983/12/30/possibly-as-large-as-jupiter/1075b265-120a-4d40-9493-a8c523b76927/?utm_term=.428a6ca7a496 |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 2, 2017 19:28:00 GMT -6
Hey, if you want to just talk, you can private message me . Yeah, the Google Sky infared is the IRAS surveys. That article is used a ton for Nibiru 'evidence'. I did some cursory searches for recent infared, but I couldn't find any. Tell us if you do? I am a Nibiru doubter. I think if Nibiru was real, there would be perbutations in planetary orbits that even I could catch. I can calculate planetary positions to about 1 or 2 arc minutes, and I don't think the planets are off. |
|
|
|
Post by watchmanjim on Jul 2, 2017 19:57:21 GMT -6
I don't know what it is I saw, but I saw something interesting near the sun this past Monday. I didn't mention it on here yet, been debating whether to. Just as the Sun went down Monday, around 8:30 PM EST, I saw what appeared to be a heavenly body just to the right of the sun, maybe five sun widths over. I couldn't keep staring at it because of the bright sunlight. I thought maybe it was Venus, because it looked about that size, but when I looked on Stellarium for that day, I found that no planets were in that area.
I think, if it was a "non-reported object," then I only was able to see it because of the cloud layer. There was overcast that day, but the sun only became visible as it slipped below the overcast (visibly) just before setting. The object appeared to be motionless (not a helicopter or anything in the atmosphere), appeared about as big as Venus, and was visible in the sunset.
|
|
